Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill common-subagent-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-subagent-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-subagent-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/common-subagent-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00807 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00323 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
common-subagent-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Subagent-Driven Development (SDD)
Priority: P1 (HIGH)
Execute multi-task implementation plans by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task, an independent task review (spec compliance + code quality) after each, and a whole-branch review at the end.
1. Execution Confirmation Gate (Scenario A & B)
Before editing code for any multi-task plan:
- DO NOT start editing files directly in this orchestrator session.
- Confirm with human partner: Offer Subagent-Driven (Recommended — fresh workers via cheap tier + task review gate, zero context bloat) vs. Inline (only for tiny 1-2 file changes).
- If approved (or user replies "yes", "proceed", "start"), invoke SDD. See methodology.md.
2. SDD & TDD Integration
- Macro (SDD): Orchestrator manages task decomposition, context isolation, review gates, and progress logging.
- Micro (TDD): Implementer subagents must follow the strict RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR cycle inside their assigned brief.
3. Setup & Workspace Resolution
Resolve the isolated, git-ignored workspace directory before Task 1:
python3 skills/common/common-subagent-driven-development/scripts/sdd_workspace.py <PLAN_FILE>
Track task completion in <workspace>/progress.md so work survives context compaction.
4. The Task Loop
For each task in the plan:
- Dispatch Implementer: Generate brief via
task_brief.py <plan> <N>. Dispatch worker using a cheap execution tier with[BRIEF_FILE]and[REPORT_FILE]. - Passive Wait (No Polling): Call
wait()and yield control. Never poll status or activity in a loop. - Dispatch Reviewer: Generate package via
review_package.py <plan> $BASE $HEAD. Dispatch task reviewer with[BRIEF_FILE],[REPORT_FILE], and[DIFF_FILE]. - Fix Loop (Up to 5 Rounds): Re-prompt existing worker via
send_agent_promptwith findings; re-review withre-review-prompt.md.
5. Final Review & Completion
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 74 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 37e54d6f9548
common-subagent-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (569 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 807 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd
A guide for test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write a failing test before writing the code that should pass it.
testing-patterns
Backend testing patterns with JUnit 6, Mockito 6, Testcontainers 2.0, Spring Boot slice tests, RestTestClient, and security testing. Use when user mentions testing, coverage, TDD, integration tests, or "write tests for".
tdd
Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.
tdd-workflow
Enforce test-driven development with 80%+ coverage target. Use when implementing features, bug fixes, or refactors.
dpf-tdd
Use for DPF test-first work. Write the failing behavior test first, make it green, refactor, then run the functional gate; never claim an unrun test passed.
speckit-tdd-plan
Derive the feature's test list by delegating to zfa tdd plan (deterministic engine); falls back to LLM-guided derivation only when zfa is unavailable.