Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add irahardianto/awesome-agv --skill bugfixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/irahardianto/awesome-agvWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/bugfix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/bugfix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/bugfix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/bugfix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/bugfix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00689 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
bugfix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug-Fix Skill
Entry-point guard: This is a user-invoked command skill (
/bugfix). If you are a spawned subagent, do NOT execute this skill — return to your assigned scope card.
Purpose
Fix bugs of any size — from one-line hotfixes to multi-file debugging sessions — without the overhead of a full feature workflow.
When to Use
- Bug fixes (any size, any complexity)
- Hotfixes for production issues
- Addressing review findings from
/audit - Regression fixes after deployments
- Flaky test fixes
When NOT to Use
- New features (use
/workflow-solo) - Refactoring (use
/refactor) - Code quality audits (use
/audit)
Pre-Implementation Checklist
Before starting, you MUST:
- Scan
.agents/rules/directory for applicable rules - Read
rule-priority.mdfor conflict resolution
Phases
Phase 1: Diagnose
Set Mode: Use task_boundary to set mode to PLANNING
- Identify the bug or issue
- Locate the affected code — trace from symptoms to root cause
- If the cause is not immediately obvious, activate the Debugging Protocol skill
- Assess blast radius — which files, features, and tests are affected?
- Define the fix in
task.md
Skills to consider:
- Debugging Protocol — for non-obvious root causes, flaky tests, or multi-component bugs
- Sequential Thinking — when multiple hypotheses need systematic evaluation
Phase 2: Fix + Test (TDD)
Set Mode: Use task_boundary to set mode to EXECUTION
- Write a failing test that reproduces the bug
- Apply the fix to make the test pass
- Verify existing tests still pass
- If the fix touches integration boundaries (database queries, API calls, external services), write or update integration tests
- Follow applicable rules:
- Error Handling Principles @error-handling-principles.md
- Logging and Observability Mandate @logging-and-observability-mandate.md
Phase 3: Verify + Ship
Set Mode: Use task_boundary to set mode to VERIFICATION
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 73 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A b292eea1bd2f
bugfix is a skill published in the GitHub repository irahardianto/awesome-agv (156 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 689 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-15.
Other skills, from other repositories
legacy-code-changes
Making safe changes in unfamiliar, undertested, or legacy codebases — comprehension before modification, characterization tests, seams, and incremental replacement. Use when working in a codebase you didn't write, inheriting a project, touching code with no tests, planning a refactor of old code, or when the user says…
om-troubleshooter
Diagnose and fix standalone Open Mercato bugs across scope, commands, locking, fields, generated registries, UI hydration, cache/search, bootstraps, queues, and providers. Use for "fix bug", "why does this fail", "regression", "debug", "napraw błąd", or a failing test.
verify-bug
Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.
common-subagent-driven-development
Execute multi-task implementation plans by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task with independent review gates. Use when implementing plans, executing multi-task PRs, or transitioning from planning to implementation.
implement-feature
Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, revision-bound evidence, and PR-ready output.
common-tdd
Guides quality-first TDD for new behavior, bug fixes, and test changes. Selects the smallest test layer, proves a distinct regression risk, and runs bounded RED-GREEN-REFACTOR verification.