Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill implement-featuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/implement-feature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/implement-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/implement-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/implement-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/implement-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 40 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01100 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00550 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
implement-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement Feature Skill
[!IMPORTANT] Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, evidence, and PR-ready output.
Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.
Instructions
When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:
Implement Feature Workflow
Goal: Build an approved feature through TDD slices and route completed work to verification.
Steps
- Load plan:
- Search
docs/prd/anddocs/srs/for a matching[slug]; if absent, use the newest matching artifact. - If multiple candidates exist, ask the user to choose or input the target slug.
- PRD or ticket
- SRS/FRS technical design if present
- Implementation plan
- Matched framework and common skills
- If stable
REQ-*,AC-*, trace, or required SRS/test lanes are missing, stop and route toplan-feature,design-solution, orimplementation-readiness.
- Search
- Prepare workspace:
- Confirm clean or intentionally dirty git state.
- Create branch or worktree only when project workflow expects it.
- Provision dependencies BEFORE tests (
npm ci/pnpm i/yarn,flutter pub get,./gradlew dependencies, orpip install -e .from the lockfile); isolated worktrees lack ignored toolchains. - If install fails from network, auth, or time budget, report
verification_infra_failedwith the exact command/error; never claim tests passed or silently skip verification. - Initialize or update
docs/srs/srs-task-list.mdwith small vertical slices.
- Implement slices:
- For each slice, write or update the failing test first.
- Before the test, record its observable contract, distinct fault, smallest layer, minimal cases, and exact focused command (the Test Intent Record).
- Consume the named
REQ-*andAC-*for each slice; do not invent scope from code inspection. - For new behavior, do not keep pre-test implementation code as a reference: observe the expected RED first.
- For legacy or bug-fix slices, characterize only when needed, then make the intended change RED while preserving unrelated existing code.
- Implement the smallest passing code.
- Refactor without expanding scope.
- Run the focused target in foreground, single-run, sequential mode; classify invalid RED, unexpected GREEN, timeout, and cleanup instead of retrying blindly.
- Keep slice evidence near the task item.
- Use sub-agents only when the runtime supports them and ownership is disjoint.
- If a fix path is unclear, stop and apply root-cause debugging before more code changes.
- Maintain context hygiene:
- Start fresh context for large independent slices when possible.
- Preserve decisions in
docs/srs/srs-task-list.mdordocs/prd/prd-plan-[slug].md. - If behavior or scope changes, update
docs/prd/prd-[slug].mdanddocs/srs/srs-[slug].mdbefore closing the slice. - Avoid carrying raw logs; summarize failures and fixes.
- Prepare handoff:
- Run fresh local automated checks before claiming success.
- Update requirement trace notes for changed AC coverage.
- Capture evidence in
docs/srs/srs-walkthrough.md. - For autonomous/channel mode, delegate only with disjoint files, owner, AC IDs, expected artifact, and verification command.
- Route next step to
verify-work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 96 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 9e47f23c584c
implement-feature is a skill published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (565 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,100 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
server-side-calls
Call tRPC procedures directly from server code using t.createCallerFactory() and router.createCaller(context) for integration testing, internal server logic, and custom API endpoints. Catch TRPCError and extract HTTP status with getHTTPStatusCodeFromError(). Error handling via onError option.
Component Test Scaffold (Next.js)
Generate React/Next.js component test skeletons (RTL) from specifications.
tdd
A guide for test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write a failing test before writing the code that should pass it.
fullstack-engineer
Consolidated web engineering skill combining backend and frontend development. Implements backend services, APIs, business logic, and web frontends (React/Next.js). Includes clean architecture, TDD, error handling, and state management patterns. Combines: software-engineer + frontend-engineer.
testing-patterns
Backend testing patterns with JUnit 6, Mockito 6, Testcontainers 2.0, Spring Boot slice tests, RestTestClient, and security testing. Use when user mentions testing, coverage, TDD, integration tests, or "write tests for".
react-web
React web development with hooks, React Query, Zustand.