Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill uat-signoffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/uat-signoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/uat-signoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/uat-signoff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/uat-signoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/uat-signoff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 46 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00838 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00335 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
uat-signoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Uat Signoff Skill
[!IMPORTANT] Walk a business/UAT approver through a plain-language demo of a verified feature and capture business acceptance signoff.
Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.
Instructions
When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:
UAT Signoff Workflow
Goal: Convert a verify-work PASS into an explicit, evidence-linked business acceptance decision before release.
Steps
- Load scope:
verify-workreport, AC list, PRD/BRD-lite business objective, open defect ledger, residual risks, and inheritedoperator_profileperskills/quality-engineering/quality-engineering-test-plan-authoring/references/lifecycle-and-roles.md.- Load
common-operator-profile;release_confidencefromtest-loop/quality-engineering-automation-health.
- Draft demo script (V-Model Level 1 Acceptance):
- Map each AC to an observable business outcome in plain language; technical details and residual risks go to appendix.
- For
operator_profile=businessorhybrid, this plain-language script is the primary artifact.
- Walk the signoff:
- Present each AC outcome, open defects, and residual risks (e.g. untested device cells, waived non-blockers).
- Technical PASS confirms contract verification only; human approver accepts or rejects business delivery.
- Ask max 3 blocking questions at a time with a recommended default and 2-3 options.
- Capture decision:
- Signoff owner, date, per-AC accept/reject, and accepted residual risks. Reject on any AC -> route to
dev-fix. - Full accept -> route to
deploy-release.
- Signoff owner, date, per-AC accept/reject, and accepted residual risks. Reject on any AC -> route to
- Persist:
- Write the run record to
artifacts/runs/[slug]/[compactISO]-uat-signoff.jsonwhen file writes are allowed.
- Write the run record to
Runtime Contract
- Use after
verify-workPASS on a feature, beforedeploy-release. - Required inputs: a PASS verification report with an AC list to demo against.
- Return BLOCKED only when no verification report exists or the approver is unavailable in autonomous/channel mode.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -2 lines 750afa39cef8
- 28d ago Changed · +1 lines 582405f282bd
- 1mo ago Changed 92c8fe1282a3
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 272af85ac814
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 829ff9e4b5ca
uat-signoff is a skill published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (582 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 838 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify
Build/launch/drive recipe for verifying apps/docs changes at runtime (demos, docs pages, llms.txt).
browser-automation
Playwright browser automation via MCP. Covers E2E testing, UI review, web scraping, screenshot capture, and general browser interaction. MCP-first — CLI is fallback only.
mobile-testing
Mobile E2E testing patterns — Flutter integrationtest, Patrol, Maestro, golden testing, device matrix, and test data management. Use when writing E2E tests for mobile applications.
test-e2e
Plans, authors, and executes end-to-end tests for mobile and web platforms. User-invoked entry point via /test-e2e; not for autonomous or subagent use.
test-integration
Audits I/O adapters, sets up test infrastructure, and systematically improves integration test coverage. User-invoked entry point via /test-integration; not for autonomous or subagent use.
testing-guide
A testing guide covering the test pyramid and standards for unit, integration, system, and end-to-end tests.