Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-App. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-App/master/.agents/skills/review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-AppWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangsonww/petswipe-match-app/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use this skill for review work in PetSwipe.
Workflow
- Review for correctness and regression risk first.
- Check deployment, validation, and doc-sync impact second.
- Prefer concrete findings over broad commentary.
- If there are no findings, say so explicitly and mention residual uncertainty.
Output Standard
- Findings first
- Highest severity first
- File references whenever possible
- Brief open questions or residual risks after findings
Read references/review-checklist.md before finalizing.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 23 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 980030d6f946
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoangsonww/PetSwipe-Match-App (26 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-compliance-review
Reviews Pull Requests that add or modify compliance frameworks. Trigger: When reviewing PRs with compliance framework changes, CIS/NIST/PCI-DSS additions, or compliance JSON files.
prowler-pr
Creates Pull Requests for Prowler following the project template and conventions. Trigger: When working on pull request requirements or creation (PR template sections, PR title Conventional Commits check, changelog gate/no-changelog label), or when inspecting PR-related GitHub workflows like conventional-commit.yml…
redshift-support-specialist
Amazon Redshift domain expertise for query optimization, operational reviews, and cost optimization on provisioned clusters and Serverless workgroups. Use when a user asks about Redshift query tuning, slow queries, disk spill, distribution/sort key issues, a Redshift health check or operational review, or Redshift…
rds-operation-review
Comprehensive Amazon RDS and Aurora operational review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and RDS/Aurora best practices. Use this skill when a user asks to review, audit, or assess RDS instances or Aurora clusters for best practices compliance, security posture, reliability, performance, cost…
bedrock-adoption-readiness
Amazon Bedrock production readiness assessment covering IAM governance, data retention (ZDR), quota and capacity headroom, and operational observability across Standard Bedrock and Mantle surfaces. Use this skill when a user asks to review Bedrock readiness, assess Bedrock security posture, evaluate quota headroom…
database-migration-service-expertise
AWS Database Migration Service (DMS) operational review and troubleshooting skill. Conducts best practices validation, health assessments, performance diagnostics, cost optimization reviews, and migration cutover guidance. Triggers on requests like "DMS review", "DMS health check", "DMS troubleshooting", "migration…