Prowler is an open-source cloud security platform that checks cloud environments for security issues and compliance with standards such as CIS, NIST, and GDPR. Security teams use it to assess configurations, prioritize findings, produce reports, and guide remediation.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add prowler-cloud/prowler --skill prowler-compliance-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowlerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-compliance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-compliance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-compliance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01315 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00658 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
prowler-compliance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
- Reviewing PRs that add new compliance frameworks
- Reviewing PRs that modify existing compliance frameworks
- Validating compliance framework JSON structure before merge
Review Checklist (Critical)
| Check | Command/Method | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| JSON Valid | python3 -m json.tool file.json |
No syntax errors |
| All Checks Exist | Run validation script | 0 missing checks |
| No Duplicate IDs | Run validation script | 0 duplicate requirement IDs |
| Changelog fragment | Manual review | Fragment present under prowler/changelog.d/ |
| Dashboard File | Compare with existing | Follows established pattern |
| Framework Metadata | Manual review | All required fields populated |
Commands
# 1. Validate JSON syntax
python3 -m json.tool prowler/compliance/{provider}/{framework}.json > /dev/null \
&& echo "Valid JSON" || echo "INVALID JSON"
# 2. Run full validation script
python3 skills/prowler-compliance-review/assets/validate_compliance.py \
prowler/compliance/{provider}/{framework}.json
# 3. Compare dashboard with existing (find similar framework)
diff dashboard/compliance/{new_framework}.py \
dashboard/compliance/{existing_framework}.py
Decision Tree
JSON Valid?
├── No → FAIL: Fix JSON syntax errors
└── Yes ↓
All Checks Exist in Codebase?
├── Missing checks → FAIL: Add missing checks or remove from framework
└── All exist ↓
Duplicate Requirement IDs?
├── Yes → FAIL: Fix duplicate IDs
└── No ↓
Changelog Fragment Present?
├── No → REQUEST CHANGES: Add changelog fragment
└── Yes ↓
Dashboard File Follows Pattern?
├── No → REQUEST CHANGES: Fix dashboard pattern
└── Yes ↓
Framework Metadata Complete?
├── No → REQUEST CHANGES: Add missing metadata
└── Yes → APPROVE
Framework Structure Reference
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 190 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 51826e23dd41
prowler-compliance-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository prowler-cloud/prowler (14,786 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,315 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
eks-operation-review
Comprehensive Amazon EKS operational review aligned with the AWS EKS Best Practices Guide. Use this skill when a user asks to review, audit, or assess EKS clusters for best practices compliance, operational readiness, security posture, cost optimization, reliability, networking, scalability, or upgrade readiness.…
rds-operation-review
Comprehensive Amazon RDS and Aurora operational review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and RDS/Aurora best practices. Use this skill when a user asks to review, audit, or assess RDS instances or Aurora clusters for best practices compliance, security posture, reliability, performance, cost…
ponytail-sec
Security companion for active development. Scopes to the current diff or changed files. Three passes: YAGNI code review, new-dep assessment, and up to 3 material hardening findings. Lean by design — surfaces the one thing to fix before merging, not a backlog. Use ponytail-sec-audit for a full project scan.
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…
self-improver
Review affiliate campaign results and improve strategy. Triggers on: "review my results", "what went wrong", "how to improve conversions", "analyze my campaign", "affiliate retrospective", "why am I not converting", "improve my strategy", "what should I change", "campaign review", "optimize my approach", "learn from…
ss-review
Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.