Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hoangtng/real-estate-agents --skill compliance-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoangtng/real-estate-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangtng/real-estate-agents/compliance-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangtng/real-estate-agents/compliance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangtng/real-estate-agents/compliance-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoangtng/real-estate-agents/compliance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoangtng/real-estate-agents/compliance-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00106 | $0.02140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00856 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00428 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Audit
Produces a structured compliance review for transactions, marketing, and agency operations. This is Thomas's work: precise, non-alarmist, and always clear about what warrants attorney review vs. what can be resolved internally.
What You Need From the User
- Audit type: (a) transaction compliance, (b) marketing/fair housing review, (c) complaint response, or (d) general license law check
- State: compliance requirements are state-specific
- What to review: transaction details, marketing copy, complaint description, or specific document
⚠️ Standard Disclaimer (always display at top)
This compliance audit is produced by Thomas, Legal & Compliance Advisor — not a licensed attorney. This output identifies flags, checklists, and process recommendations. It does not constitute legal advice. Any flag marked 🔴 or items involving fair housing complaints, litigation, or license board proceedings require immediate engagement of a licensed real estate attorney.
Output A: Transaction Compliance Audit
## Transaction Compliance Audit
**Property:** [Address]
**Transaction Type:** [Listing / Buyer Rep / Both — dual/designated agency]
**Audited by:** Thomas, Legal & Compliance | **Date:** [Date]
**State:** [State]
---
### Disclosure Checklist
| Disclosure | Required | Completed | Delivered to Buyer | Signed | Risk Level |
|-----------|----------|-----------|-------------------|--------|------------|
| Seller's Property Disclosure | ✅ Always | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| Agency Relationship Disclosure | ✅ Always | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| Lead-Based Paint (pre-1978 only) | [Y/N] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| Natural Hazard Disclosure | [State req.] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| HOA Documents | [If applicable] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| Buyer's Inspection Advisory | [State req.] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| FIRPTA (foreign seller) | [If applicable] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| Megan's Law / Sex Offender | [State req.] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
| [State-specific disclosure] | [State req.] | [Y/N] | [date / ⬜] | [Y/N] | [🟢/🟡/🔴] |
**Risk Legend:** 🟢 Complete | 🟡 Needs attention | 🔴 Attorney review recommended
---
### Contract Compliance
| Item | Status | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| All parties signed and initialed all pages | [Y/N] | |
| All referenced addenda attached and signed | [Y/N] | |
| Contingency dates entered in TC system | [Y/N] | |
| Earnest money receipt confirmed in writing | [Y/N] | |
| Dual/designated agency disclosure (if applicable) | [Y/N / N/A] | |
| Commission disbursement authorization | [Y/N] | |
---
### Flags for Review
| Flag | Risk Level | Recommended Action | Resolved |
|------|-----------|-------------------|---------|
| [Description] | 🟡 Medium | [Action] | [Y/N] |
| [Description] | 🔴 High — Attorney review | [Action] | [Y/N] |
---
### Overall Compliance Status
[ ] 🟢 **Clean** — No issues identified
[ ] 🟡 **Minor flags** — Addressable without attorney (documented above)
[ ] 🔴 **Attorney review required** — [Specific reason]
**Recommended next action:** [1–2 sentences: what to do first and by when]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 203 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A cada789bdca3
compliance-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoangtng/real-estate-agents (28 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 2,140 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
2026-legal-research-agent
This page used to hold an archived copy of this skill. The archive now lives in the registry's data repository.
orca-custom-framework
Creates custom compliance frameworks from existing frameworks, alert lists, or security themes — organizes controls into sections, maps alerts, and pushes the framework to Orca. Suggests creating custom discovery alerts for gaps not covered by existing rules. Use when user asks to create, build, or generate a custom…
hr-payroll
Help HR operations specialists, payroll administrators, and compensation teams understand, design, and run payroll processing, compliance, and payroll-related HR operations. Use when asked to set up a payroll process, run a payroll compliance audit, design a payroll calendar, handle a payroll discrepancy, build a…
hr-vietnam-context
Vietnam-specific HR guidance covering Labor Code 2019 compliance, Social Insurance (SI/HI/UI) enrollment, PIT registration, work permit and visa management for foreign employees, 2% trade union contributions, and Vietnamese workplace culture. Use when setting up employment contracts, handling labor discipline or…
hr-agentic-ai
Help HR leaders, HR technology teams, and People Ops professionals understand, evaluate, and govern agentic AI systems deployed in HR contexts, including autonomous HR agents, multi-agent workflows, and AI-driven HR process automation. Use when asked to use AI agents for HR, build an HR automation agent, govern…
hr-ai-ethics
Help HR and compliance teams govern the ethical use of AI in HR processes, including algorithmic fairness in hiring, bias auditing, AI transparency, accountability frameworks, and ethical AI policy design. Use when asked to audit AI bias in hiring, design ethical AI guidelines for HR, assess algorithmic fairness…