core: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/ha-pr-reviewer/SKILL.md

ha-pr-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code from home-assistant/core. It costs 32 tokens per session (183 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review workflow for Home Assistant pull requests on GitHub. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for discussion and approval.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a pull request’s description and changes, review them against the Home Assistant review rules, and report unaddressed comments in the console.
Why use it?
It combines the project’s review process with an audit of discussion threads, helping surface both code problems and feedback that remains unresolved.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions subagents.

This is home-assistant/core's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on core itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything core configures →

About the project

Home Assistant is open-source home automation software that lets people control devices and actions locally through a modular system. It is used by home-automation enthusiasts and DIY users, often on a Raspberry Pi or local server; the catalogue entries support operating or developing its integrations and codebase.

home-assistant/core · 90,352 stars · on GitHub · home-assistant.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to home-assistant/core. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/home-assistant/core/dev/.claude/skills/ha-pr-reviewer/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/home-assistant/core

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ha-pr-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/home-assistant/core/ha-pr-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/home-assistant/core/ha-pr-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/home-assistant/core/ha-pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/home-assistant/core/ha-pr-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ha-pr-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/home-assistant/core/ha-pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/home-assistant/core/ha-pr-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 183 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Snyk warn 7 Sept 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00183
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00092
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00037
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00018

Measured 9d ago against content hash 6012acb6e249, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ha-pr-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/ha-pr-reviewer/SKILL.md · 16 lines

What it actually says

Review GitHub Pull Request

Instructions:

  • Use 'gh pr view' to get the PR details and description.
  • Use 'gh pr diff' to see all the changes in the PR.
  • Review the changes following the ha-review skill. It is VERY IMPORTANT to follow the ha-review skill instructions. Explicitly pass the PR's target/base branch to the ha-review skill (obtained via gh pr view) so it diffs against the correct base.
  • Run a subagent in parallel to check the PR review comments following the ha-pr-comment-audit skill.

IMPORTANT:

  • Only provide review feedback in the CONSOLE. DO NOT ACT ON GITHUB.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 16 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 6012acb6e249

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ha-pr-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository home-assistant/core (90,352 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 183 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.