Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/favro-webhooksnpx skills add hookdeck/webhook-skills --skill favro-webhooksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hookdeck/webhook-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00121 | $0.02391 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01196 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
favro-webhooks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Favro Webhooks
When to Use This Skill
- How do I receive Favro webhooks?
- How do I verify the Favro
X-Favro-Webhooksignature? - Why is my Favro webhook signature verification failing?
- How do I respond to the Favro setup ping so the webhook validates?
- How do I handle
card.created,card.committed,card.moved,card.updated,card.deletedevents? - How do I handle
comment.created,comment.updated,comment.deletedevents?
How Favro Webhooks Work (Read This First)
Favro does not use the Standard Webhooks spec. Its signature scheme is unusual in one critical way: the signed message is not the request body. From the Favro developer docs:
The header is a base64 digest of an HMAC-SHA1 hash. The hashed content is the concatenation of the
payloadIdand the URL exactly as it was provided during webhook creation. The key used to sign this text is the secret you entered when setting up the webhook.
So verification requires three inputs — and the body is not one of them:
X-Favro-Webhook = base64( HMAC-SHA1( key = secret, message = payloadId + webhookUrl ) )
└─ from body ─┘ └─ from config ─┘
Two consequences drive everything below:
- You must know the exact URL you registered. The
webhookUrlin the HMAC is thepostToUrlyou gave Favro verbatim — same scheme, host, path, trailing slash, and query string. Store it as an env var (FAVRO_WEBHOOK_URL) and keep it byte-identical to what you registered, or every signature will mismatch. - The
payloadIdcomes from the JSON body. Every delivery (including the setup ping) carries a top-levelpayloadIdstring. Parse it out, concatenatepayloadId + webhookUrl, and HMAC that — not the body bytes.
Favro ──POST {"payloadId":"…","action":"…", …}──▶ your endpoint
X-Favro-Webhook: <base64 HMAC-SHA1> │ expected = base64(HMAC-SHA1(secret, payloadId + FAVRO_WEBHOOK_URL))
▼ timing-safe compare to header
valid? → dispatch on action → 200
ping? → 200 (validates the webhook)
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/express/.env.example 347 B
- examples/express/package.json 364 B
- examples/express/README.md 1.6 KB
- examples/express/src/index.js 4.0 KB runs code
- examples/express/test/webhook.test.js 4.5 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/.env.example 277 B
- examples/fastapi/main.py 3.7 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/README.md 1.7 KB
- examples/fastapi/requirements.txt 82 B
- examples/fastapi/test_webhook.py 4.8 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/.env.example 277 B
- examples/nextjs/app/webhooks/favro/route.ts 3.6 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/package.json 489 B
- examples/nextjs/README.md 1.6 KB
- examples/nextjs/test/webhook.test.ts 4.6 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/vitest.config.ts 140 B runs code
- references/overview.md 3.7 KB
- references/setup.md 2.8 KB
- references/verification.md 4.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 188 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A bdaf770fb118
favro-webhooks is a skill published in the GitHub repository hookdeck/webhook-skills (84 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 2,391 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
wiki
Rebuild a flow-first project wiki using the mimirs wiki MCP tool. Use when the user asks to generate, rebuild, refresh, or write the wiki for a codebase.
scout
Research the web for solutions, competitors, alternatives, or prior art for a decision facing this project — then store the findings in project memory so they survive the session. Use when choosing a library or approach, comparing tools, checking what others do, or evaluating whether to build vs adopt.
plan
Design an implementation plan before writing code — where the change lands, what it will touch, what could break, and the steps in order. Use when asked to plan a feature, scope a change, or figure out how to approach an edit before making it. To assess a change that already exists (a diff, refactor, or rename), use…
research
Answer a hard, open-ended question about how the project works or is built by synthesizing every source — code, structure, git history, prior decisions, discussion, caveats — and verifying each claim against the source. Use for deep cross-cutting questions that span more than one area. Narrower siblings — a single…
explore
Build an accurate mental model of an unfamiliar codebase, feature, or area before changing it — where it lives, how it connects, what it does, and why. Use when asked how something works, where something is, when onboarding to a repo, or before editing code you don't know. For a cross-cutting question that needs…
handoff
Wrap up a work session so the next session (or another agent) can pick up cleanly — what was done, what's in flight, what to watch out for. Use when ending a session, switching tasks, or asked to hand off, wrap up, or save state for later.