Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/zift-webhooksnpx skills add hookdeck/webhook-skills --skill zift-webhooksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hookdeck/webhook-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/zift-webhooks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/zift-webhooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hookdeck/webhook-skills/zift-webhooks.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01083 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
zift-webhooks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Zift Webhooks
Zift (a payments platform / gateway) delivers notifications — billing and
processing events — to an HTTPS endpoint you register with Zift support. Each
delivery is a plain HTTPS POST with a JSON body. There is no signature,
no HMAC, and no auth header on the delivery. Instead, your endpoint proves it
received the notification by echoing the notificationId back in the response
body — that response is the acknowledgement, and skipping it triggers retries.
When to Use This Skill
- How do I receive Zift webhook notifications?
- How do I acknowledge a Zift webhook (the
{"notificationId": ...}response)? - Why is there no
X-Zift-Signature/ HMAC header to verify? - How do I secure a Zift webhook endpoint with no signature?
- How do I handle Zift
billing.*andprocessing.*events (chargeback, return, NOC)? - Why does Zift keep retrying / marking my webhook
Failed?
Verification & Acknowledgement (core)
There is NO per-message signature/HMAC header on Zift notifications. Do not
look for X-Zift-Signature, webhook-signature, or any Standard Webhooks
header — none exists, and Zift sends no Basic/token auth on delivery either.
Authenticity relies on the transport and endpoint secrecy:
- HTTPS only — publish the endpoint over TLS so the body can't be read or tampered with in transit.
- Endpoint-URL secrecy — treat the path as a shared secret; use a long, unguessable path.
- IP allowlisting (recommended) — restrict inbound to Zift's egress ranges at your load balancer / firewall (confirm ranges with Zift support).
Because there is no body signature, ordinary JSON parsing is fine — the raw bytes are not security-critical (unlike HMAC providers).
The critical part is the acknowledgement. To ACK a delivery your endpoint
MUST return a JSON body echoing the received notificationId (Zift accepts an
int or a string). Anything else — 200 OK, an empty body, {"received":true} —
is not an acknowledgement and triggers Zift's retry schedule.
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/express/.env.example 460 B
- examples/express/package.json 377 B
- examples/express/README.md 1.5 KB
- examples/express/src/index.js 3.5 KB runs code
- examples/express/test/webhook.test.js 2.9 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/.env.example 389 B
- examples/fastapi/main.py 3.2 KB runs code
- examples/fastapi/README.md 1.7 KB
- examples/fastapi/requirements.txt 82 B
- examples/fastapi/test_webhook.py 2.8 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/.env.example 389 B
- examples/nextjs/app/webhooks/zift/route.ts 3.0 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/package.json 489 B
- examples/nextjs/README.md 1.6 KB
- examples/nextjs/test/webhook.test.ts 2.8 KB runs code
- examples/nextjs/vitest.config.ts 140 B runs code
- references/overview.md 4.3 KB
- references/setup.md 2.8 KB
- references/verification.md 4.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 187 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 7c9b06aef052
zift-webhooks is a skill published in the GitHub repository hookdeck/webhook-skills (84 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,166 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…