Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to htlin222/robust-lit-review. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/htlin222/robust-lit-review/main/.claude/skills/brainstorm-topic/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/htlin222/robust-lit-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/htlin222/robust-lit-review/brainstorm-topic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/htlin222/robust-lit-review/brainstorm-topic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/htlin222/robust-lit-review/brainstorm-topic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/htlin222/robust-lit-review/brainstorm-topic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/htlin222/robust-lit-review/brainstorm-topic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00598 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorm-topic scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s "https://api.elsevier.com/content/search/scopus?query=TITLE-ABS-KEY(term)&count=0" \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brainstorm Research Topic Skill
You are a research methodology expert helping the user develop a comprehensive search strategy for a systematic literature review.
Process
Step 1: Understand the Topic
Ask the user for their research area. Probe with:
- What specific aspect interests you most?
- Clinical/applied or theoretical focus?
- Any population/setting constraints?
- Time period of interest?
Step 2: Generate Search Strategy
For the given topic, produce:
- Primary Search Terms (3-5 exact phrases)
- Synonyms and Alternatives (5-10 related terms)
- MeSH Terms (for PubMed — use the MeSH vocabulary)
- Emtree Terms (for Embase — use Emtree vocabulary)
- Boolean Query (combined with AND/OR/NOT)
- Scopus Field Codes (TITLE-ABS-KEY, AUTHKEY, etc.)
Step 3: Validate Search Terms
Use the APIs to test each query and report result counts:
# Test Scopus
curl -s "https://api.elsevier.com/content/search/scopus?query=TITLE-ABS-KEY(term)&count=0" \
-H "X-ELS-APIKey: $SCOPUS_API_KEY" | python -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['search-results']['opensearch:totalResults'])"
# Test PubMed
curl -s "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&retmode=json&retmax=0&term=query&api_key=$PUBMED_API_KEY" \
| python -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['esearchresult']['count'])"
Step 4: Refine
Present a table:
| Database | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Scopus | ... | N |
| PubMed | ... | N |
| Embase | ... | N |
If results are:
- Too many (>5000): Narrow with additional terms, date limits, or article type filters
- Too few (<50): Broaden synonyms, remove restrictive terms
- Sweet spot (100-1000): Proceed
Step 5: Output
Provide the finalized search strategy as a ready-to-use command:
lit-review "<TOPIC>" \
--term "term1" \
--term "term2" \
--term "term3" \
--target 50 \
--min-citescore 3.0
Or offer to run /lit-review directly with the refined terms.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 93c5f525124f
brainstorm-topic is a skill published in the GitHub repository htlin222/robust-lit-review (61 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 598 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
brainstorm-topic compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brainstorm-topichtlin222/robust-lit-review | Skill | 61 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| geopandas-spatialbeita6969/ScienceClaw | Skill | 1.0k | yesterday | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code, Codex |
| pymatgen-materialsbeita6969/ScienceClaw | Skill | 1.0k | yesterday | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code, Codex |
| rdkit-chemistrybeita6969/ScienceClaw | Skill | 1.0k | yesterday | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autonomous-researchfedericodeponte/opendraft | Skill | 527 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 144 | Claude Code, Codex |
| Deep ResearchAgentEra/Agently | Skill | 1.7k | 24d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| cirqLeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills | Skill | 1.0k | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 67 | Claude Code, Codex |