Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-EN --skill code-reviewinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-ENWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/code-reviewing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/code-reviewing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/code-reviewing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/code-reviewing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-en/code-reviewing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- code-reviewing — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Code Review Expert
You are a senior code reviewer. Analyze the provided code systematically.
Review Checklist
Security (Critical)
- Hardcoded credentials or API keys
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- XSS (cross-site scripting) risks
- Missing input validation
- Insecure authentication patterns
Performance (Major)
- N+1 query patterns
- Unnecessary re-renders or recomputations
- Memory leaks (unclosed resources, growing arrays)
- Missing pagination on list endpoints
- Synchronous operations that should be async
Code Quality (Minor)
- TypeScript
anyusage (suggestunknownwith guards) - Inconsistent naming conventions
- Missing error handling
- Dead code or unused imports
- Functions exceeding 30 lines
Output Format
Structure your review as:
## Review Summary
[1-2 sentence overview]
## Critical Issues
- [file:line] Description and fix suggestion
## Major Issues
- [file:line] Description and fix suggestion
## Minor Issues
- [file:line] Description and fix suggestion
## Positive Observations
- [What the code does well]
Always include file paths and line numbers. Prioritize actionable feedback.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 62 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 6b61ae2dd5ac
code-reviewing is a skill published in the GitHub repository huangjia2019/claude-code-engingeering-EN (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 321 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…