address-pr-review

address-pr-review is a skill for Claude Code from husniadil/ekstend. It costs 33 tokens per session (5,396 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for handling unresolved comments on a GitHub pull request, which is a proposed code change waiting for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to fetch review comments, check them against the code, make single- or multi-file fixes, explain the changes, and resolve addressed threads.
Why use it?
It separates valid review findings from incorrect ones, applies appropriate fixes, and keeps the discussion and thread status up to date.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Part of the code-review plugin — 2 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to fetch review comments, check them against the code, make single- or multi-file fixes, explain the changes, and resolve addressed threads.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add husniadil/ekstend --skill address-pr-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/husniadil/ekstend

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install code-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for address-pr-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for address-pr-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/husniadil/ekstend/address-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,396 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.05396
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.02698
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.01079
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00540

Measured 11d ago against content hash 966d24d413cd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

address-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/code-review/skills/address-pr-review/SKILL.md · 464 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 464 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Address PR Review

Work through unresolved review comments on a GitHub pull request: fetch each thread, validate the claim against the pinned code, apply fixes where valid, reply with technical reasoning, and resolve the thread.

This skill is a companion to code-review. code-review finds gaps proactively from the diff; address-pr-review reacts to comments already on the PR.

Subagent Mode (argument)

Second $ARGUMENTS slot controls subagent delegation:

Value Meaning
subagent Delegate comment validation research and multi-file fixes to Task subagents in parallel
no-subagent Stay in main context — no Task delegation
auto Decide per comment: research-heavy or multi-file → delegate; simple → stay in-context
(empty) Same as auto

Default: auto. Validation re-reads always run in main context regardless of this mode.

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS is [PR_NUMBER] [subagent|no-subagent|auto]. Either slot may be omitted.

  • $1 — PR number. If omitted, infer from the current branch.
  • $2 — subagent mode (see above).

Resolution rules:

  • If $1 is a number → treat as PR number.
  • If $1 is one of subagent/no-subagent/auto → treat as subagent mode; infer PR from branch.
  • If $1 is empty → infer PR from branch. If on main/master with no PR, ask the user.

Workflow Overview

┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Resolve PR number + repo          │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Fetch unresolved review threads   │
│    via GraphQL                       │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. Detect stack + dependency versions │
│    (per-package in monorepos)         │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. Validate each comment              │
│    → valid / partial / invalid /      │
│      defer / repeat                   │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 5. Present summary → AskUserQuestion  │
│    (Apply / Done — free-form Other)   │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 6. Apply fixes (tracked fix loop)     │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 7. Push (commits live on origin)      │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 8. Reply to each item (cite live SHA) │
│    8a inline · 8b issue / body        │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 9. Resolve inline threads             │
│    (carve-out defer)                  │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────┘
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 10. Update PR description (optional)  │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘

Read the full file on GitHub · 464 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 464 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 966d24d413cd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

address-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository husniadil/ekstend (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 5,396 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

procoder

Work like a senior developer in a repository governed by procoder: run the commit gate before calling anything done, format and lint through the binary, and drive the spec, plan, todo, backlog, and sprint chain in .procoder/. Use this skill when the repository contains a .procoder/ directory or an AGENTS.md naming…

azrtydxb/procoder · 101 tokens

pr-feedback

Work a reviewer's comments on a pull request to the end - all three comment surfaces enumerated before any is triaged, every comment fixed, declined with a reason, or ticketed, push before you reply. Use when a PR comes back with review feedback or a red check.

jjanczur/tyran · 57 tokens

detect-task

Internal skill for commands. Detect the active task (any tracker adapter) from the task-state file / git branch name. Do not trigger on user conversation - only when commands need task detection.

restarter/lets-workflow · 41 tokens

loop-bb-pr

A command that prepares a repeating check for a Bitbucket pull request. A pull request is a request to review and merge code changes into a project.

restarter/lets-workflow · 118 tokens

take-task

A workflow for claiming a tracker task and preparing the development branch for it. It verifies the task, marks it as in progress, checks for uncommitted changes, and handles branch setup according to the task state.

restarter/lets-workflow · 76 tokens

session-boundary

Internal skill for commands. Resolve and VALIDATE this branch's session boundary - the ref a session's commit range is measured from - and report how much it can be trusted. Do not trigger on user conversation; only when a command needs the session range.

restarter/lets-workflow · 55 tokens