Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lgbarn/shipyard --skill git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lgbarn/shipyardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgbarn/shipyard/git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 7 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 6 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 3 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 56 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 402 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 329 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 393 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 407 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.02652 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01061 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00530 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 431 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow
When This Skill Activates
- Starting feature work that needs branch isolation
- Creating, switching, or removing worktrees
- Completing a development branch (merge, PR, preserve, discard)
/shipyard:worktreecommand invoked
Natural Language Triggers
- "create branch", "commit this", "merge branch", "start feature", "set up worktree"
Overview
Comprehensive git workflow covering the full development lifecycle: branch creation, worktree isolation, atomic commits, and branch completion.
Core principle: Systematic directory selection + safety verification + structured completion options = reliable development workflow.
Part 1: Branch and Worktree Setup
Announce at start: "I'm using the git-workflow skill to set up an isolated workspace."
Directory Selection Process
Follow this priority order:
1. Check Existing Directories
# Check in priority order
ls -d .worktrees 2>/dev/null # Preferred (hidden)
ls -d worktrees 2>/dev/null # Alternative
If found: Use that directory. If both exist, .worktrees wins.
2. Check CLAUDE.md
grep -i "worktree.*director" CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null
If preference specified: Use it without asking.
3. Ask User
If no directory exists and no CLAUDE.md preference:
No worktree directory found. Where should I create worktrees?
1. .worktrees/ (project-local, hidden)
2. ~/.config/shipyard/worktrees/<project-name>/ (global location)
Which would you prefer?
Safety Verification
For Project-Local Directories (.worktrees or worktrees):
MUST verify directory is ignored before creating worktree:
# Check if directory is ignored (respects local, global, and system gitignore)
git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/dev/null
If NOT ignored:
Fix immediately:
- Add appropriate line to .gitignore
- Commit the change
- Proceed with worktree creation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +2 tokens per session d0a9a1d56ce3
- 1mo ago First seen · 431 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A cf20b9072a7b
git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository lgbarn/shipyard (65 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 2,652 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
Automates the full release workflow: version bump, git tag, GitHub release, and npm publish.
find
Find the local coding-agent session that wrote the uncommitted changes in a file, or in a pasted snippet of changed code or comment text, and give a one-line command that resumes it. Prefers the session that authored the change over a review session. Use when asked which session, chat, thread, or agent made an edit…
git-workflow
Perform requested Git actions while preserving user work. Triggers on "commit", "提交".
quick-wrap
Short session close: commit, loose ends, stop. Not workstream-complete.
run
The single lifecycle entry point — take one or more tickets and drive each through its whole lifecycle (investigate, red tests, implement, gates, review, PR, merge, archive), interleaving them. Lean by default — one worker per ticket runs red tests, implementation and the gate scripts in one worktree, then…
naming
Evaluate and improve names in code using naming as a design diagnostic. Use when the user asks to "name this", "rename", "review naming", "what should I call", struggles to name something, or when a code review surfaces vague or misleading names.