Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills --skill ck-cookgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/ck-cook)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/ck-cook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/ck-cook/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/ck-cook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/ck-cook.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.03070 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01535 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00614 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
ck:cook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ck:cook — Budget-Aware Implementation Pipeline
Cook implements code and performs a compile/syntax check. ck:test owns tests and ck:quality owns quality review; Cook orchestrates either only after user consent.
Modes are mutually exclusive; Standard is the default:
- Standard — ask for the phase's test and quality choices, then auto-continue after the selected checks finish.
--fast— default the current phase to no unit tests and no quality gate unless explicit check flags are supplied.--hard— default both checks to yes and require human confirmation after the selected checks and before the final push.
Composable flag:
--tdd— select tests=yes and require aRED_READYartifact before implementation.--tests/--no-tests— select whetherck:test --unitcreates/runs unit tests for the current phase.--quality/--no-quality— select whetherck:quality --gateruns for the current phase.--checks-all-phases— apply explicitly supplied test/quality choices to every remaining phase; without it, ask again at the next phase.
Reject contradictory flag pairs. No old single-file JSON or mixed-format compatibility is supported. Markdown plan.md remains a separate input format.
Step 0.5 — Phase Checkpoint
Before reading implementation files or activating each phase, resolve two independent choices: Unit tests: yes/no and Quality gate: yes/no.
- Honor explicit flags without asking. In Standard mode, ask one concise question containing both choices that remain unresolved. Do not silently infer consent from a previous phase unless
--checks-all-phaseswas supplied. - In
--fast, unresolved choices default to no. In--hard, unresolved choices default to yes. - State the token/risk tradeoff briefly: tests catch behavioral regressions; quality checks architecture and maintainability; skipping either saves tokens but reduces assurance.
- Record the decision before activation/completion in a separate phase-state write. For JSON, a skipped gate requires
quality.status: skipped_by_userandquality.decision: user_confirmed_skip; it is neverapproved. Later complete the phase and master in separate phase-first/master-second writes so receipt hooks validate persisted consent. For Markdown, append[quality: skipped_by_user; decision: user_confirmed_skip]to that phase's checkbox line. A skipped test run remainsnot_startedwith a note that the user declined it. - If tests=yes without
--tdd, run/ck:test --unit <phase-file>after implementation and the Build Gate. If--tdd, use the RED/GREEN handoff described below.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 214 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A a1506b377da1
ck:cook is a skill published in the GitHub repository huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 3,070 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
terraform-test
Comprehensive guide for writing and running Terraform tests. Use when creating test files (.tftest.hcl), writing test scenarios with run blocks, validating infrastructure behavior with assertions, mocking providers and data sources, testing module outputs and resource configurations, or troubleshooting Terraform test…
provider-resources
Implement Terraform Provider resources and data sources using the Plugin Framework. Use when developing CRUD operations, schema design, state management, and acceptance testing for provider resources.
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
java-unit-test
A code-generation guide for Java unit tests in Spring Boot projects. Unit tests check one small piece of code in isolation; Spring Boot is a Java framework for building web applications and services.
running-julia-test
Before running tests for a new package, make sure the test environment is already set up. If the package does not have tests yet, follow creating-julia-test-env first. Tests that use using Test must have Test available from the package or test project.
api-testing
Testing patterns for MCP tool/resource handlers using createMockContext and Vitest. Covers mock context options, handler testing, McpError assertions, format testing, Vitest config setup, and test isolation conventions.