Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/running-julia-testnpx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill running-julia-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/running-julia-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/running-julia-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/running-julia-test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01494 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00747 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00299 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
running-julia-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Running Julia tests
Running all tests with Pkg.test()
Before running tests for a new package, make sure the test environment is already set up. If the package does not have tests yet, follow creating-julia-test-env first. Tests that use using Test must have Test available from the package or test project.
To run all of your package's tests, use the following command:
$ julia --project -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.test()'
Running specific test sets only
To run only particular test sets (for example, those defined as @testset "label" begin ... end), use the ~/.julia/bin/testrunner tool.
If testrunner is already installed, this command prints its path:
$ command -v testrunner
If you do not have the testrunner command, install it with:
$ julia -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.activate(); Pkg.Apps.add(url="https://github.com/aviatesk/TestRunner.jl")'
Basic Usage
$ testrunner demo.jl "basic tests" # Run the testset named "basic tests"
$ testrunner demo.jl "basic tests" "struct tests" # Run multiple named testsets
$ testrunner demo.jl '(:(@test startswith(inner_func2(), "inner")))' # Run a standalone test case
See the guide to learn more.
Caveat: There are cases where name or regex filters do not work as expected
Sometimes, even after specifying a testset name or a regex, all tests may run instead of just the intended ones (this seems to be due to a pattern matching behavior in TestRunner.jl). Example:
# Expected: Only "calculate: basic operations" should run (4 tests), but actually all 20 tests run
$ testrunner --project=. test/runtests.jl "calculate: basic operations"
$ testrunner --project=. test/runtests.jl 'r"^calculate: basic operations$"'
$ testrunner --project=. test/runtests.jl L6:11 # Even if you include the @testset declaration line, all tests are executed
As a workaround, specify the line range including only the @test lines (do not include the @testset ... begin declaration line). This way, you can ensure that only the intended testset is executed:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 147 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A ab34878ea5c6
running-julia-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (924 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,494 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
search
Search 2500+ curated ChatGPT and LLM open-source repositories. Use when the user asks to find tools, libraries, or repos related to ChatGPT, LLMs, RAG, agents, langchain, NLP, AI development, or any open-source AI tooling.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
mock-module
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
similar-resources
Given a Japanese NLP GitHub repo or Hugging Face model/dataset (URL / owner/repo / tool name), find repositories or models/datasets that do the same or related processing. Mines the bundled dataset for content-similar items, then expands via web research across both GitHub and Hugging Face, then merges and re-ranks.
bprr
Bulk PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review all open PRs, review unreviewed PRs, bulk review, or mentions "bprr". Reviews open PRs lacking the reviewed label and presents a summary before any merge/comment/label action.
reverse-engineering-android-malware-with-jadx
Reverse engineers malicious Android APK files using JADX decompiler to analyze Java/Kotlin source code, identify malicious functionality including data theft, C2 communication, privilege escalation, and overlay attacks. Examines manifest permissions, receivers, services, and native libraries. Activates for requests…