Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills --skill tdmcp-quality-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-quality-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-quality-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-quality-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-quality-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-quality-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.01611 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00805 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00322 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-quality-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-quality-audit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
tdmcp-quality-audit
Use this skill for broad repository quality campaigns. It coordinates existing
tdmcp specialists instead of replacing them: tdmcp-test-coverage handles focused
coverage waves, and td-feature-qa handles tool/CLI/docs/bridge boundary QA.
Execution mode: hybrid fan-out/fan-in
This environment runs coordinated sub-agents rather than TeamCreate. Spawn the
independent auditors in parallel, then fan their reports into one lead-owned plan.
Implementation happens in small waves after QA verifies the findings.
Agent roster
| Agent | Focus | Output |
|---|---|---|
tdmcp-quality-audit-lead |
scope, orchestration, shared edits, wave plan | _workspace/quality-audit/00_scope.md, 05_plan.md |
tdmcp-command-auditor |
scripts, Makefile, CI, CLI command health | _workspace/quality-audit/01_commands.md |
tdmcp-security-auditor |
trust boundaries, raw Python, env redaction, package safety | _workspace/quality-audit/02_security.md |
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor |
first-run, docs-to-command parity, CLI help/errors | _workspace/quality-audit/03_usability.md |
tdmcp-refactor-test-auditor |
coverage gaps, weak tests, complexity, refactor seams | _workspace/quality-audit/04_refactor_tests.md |
tdmcp-quality-qa |
verifies evidence and first patch wave | _workspace/quality-audit/06_qa.md |
Phase 0 - Context check
- Read
AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md,package.json,Makefile,.github/workflows/*.yml,vitest.config.ts, and existing_workspace/quality-audit/reports. - Decide run mode:
- no quality workspace: fresh audit;
- existing reports + user asks to continue/fix/re-run: partial re-run;
- new broad request: archive prior reports under
_workspace/quality-audit/archive/<timestamp>/before a fresh audit.
- Check git status. Do not revert unrelated user changes.
Phase 1 - Scope and command policy
Create _workspace/quality-audit/00_scope.md with:
- requested scope;
- current branch and dirty-state summary;
- commands that are safe one-shot;
- commands requiring timeout;
- commands requiring TouchDesigner, hardware, network, or credentials;
- commands that are publish/destructive and must not run without explicit user approval.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 152 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 764e60ff0947
tdmcp-quality-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 1,611 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-quality-audit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
moai-foundation-quality
TRUST 5 quality principles and how MoAI enforces them through agents, the 3-level harness, /moai gate, and sync-auditor scoring. Use for code review, quality gate checks, coverage targets, or TRUST 5 compliance.
orchestrated-execution
Execute work units through the rigorous 4-phase Metaswarm cycle (Implement -> Validate -> Adversarial Review -> Commit) with independent quality gate enforcement.
quality-checklist
Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations.
verification
Verification-before-completion discipline ensuring all success criteria are met, tests pass, and reviews complete before declaring work done.
check
Confirm a change before merge. /check verify drives the real app to prove behavior against the spec (every acceptance criterion met, every surface built). /check review runs a senior code review on a fresh model, one that did not write the code. Verify after /develop, review before a PR. Writes to docs/reviews/, never…
Pair Programming
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver$navigator$switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with…