Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor --skill eval-code-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/eval-code-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/eval-code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/eval-code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/eval-code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor/eval-code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.01525 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00610 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00305 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
eval-code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 187 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 5a331932b775
eval-code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor (380 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 1,525 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-strategy
Coverage-design method for qa-engineer — pyramid ratios per archetype, equivalence/boundary/property case selection, mutation score as the real coverage signal, and a flake-quarantine policy. Turns "coverage is 90%" (a number with no method) into a defensible test plan. Emits TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md, which the QA gate…
quant-validation
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness under overlapping labels, fractional differentiation, meta-labelling, and multiple-testing correction. Written because the invariants were required of…
cdt
Multi-agent development workflow using Agent Teams. Supports five modes: plan (architect teammate + PM teammate debate → plan.md), dev (developer teammate + code-tester teammate + qa-tester teammate + reviewer teammate iterate → code), full (plan → approval gate → dev), auto (plan → dev, no gate), and bugfix (tester +…
review-team
A multi-reviewer code review process that checks a change from several specialist viewpoints and combines the results into one report. It can cover bugs, security, tests, dependencies, frontend behavior, and continuous-integration workflows.
dlc
Dev Life Cycle quality gates: run security scans, code quality checks, performance analysis, test coverage, and PR review compliance. Routes to domain-specific sub-skills or runs all checks in sequence.
smoke
Runs a four probe live smoke wave after a plugin update and reports gate chain health before real work rides it.