Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rube-de/cc-skills --skill dlcgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/dlc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/dlc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/dlc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/dlc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/dlc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00837 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00418 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
dlc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dev Life Cycle (DLC)
Automated quality gates for the development life cycle. Each sub-skill detects your project type, runs appropriate tools, and creates a GitHub issue with structured findings.
Sub-Skills
| Skill | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Security | /dlc:security |
Dependency audits, SAST scanning, secret detection |
| Quality | /dlc:quality |
Linting, complexity analysis, duplication, dead code |
| Performance | /dlc:perf |
Bundle analysis, profiling, algorithmic complexity review |
| Testing | /dlc:test |
Test execution, coverage measurement, gap analysis |
| PR Review | /dlc:pr-check |
Fetch PR comments, implement fixes, reply inline |
| PR Validity | /dlc:pr-validity |
Detect duplicate/redundant code in PR changes |
| Git Ops | /dlc:git-ops |
Branch cleanup, remote pruning, repo state verification |
Usage
/dlc → Show this overview
/dlc security → Run security scan
/dlc:security → Run security scan (alternate syntax)
/dlc --all → Run all checks in sequence
Routing
Parse the first argument:
| Argument | Route to |
|---|---|
--all |
Run all sub-skills in sequence (see below) |
security |
Invoke dlc:security via Skill |
quality |
Invoke dlc:quality via Skill |
perf |
Invoke dlc:perf via Skill |
test |
Invoke dlc:test via Skill |
pr-check |
Invoke dlc:pr-check via Skill |
pr-validity |
Invoke dlc:pr-validity via Skill |
git-ops |
Invoke dlc:git-ops via Skill |
| empty | Show overview and use AskUserQuestion to ask which check to run |
If routing to a single sub-skill, invoke it with Skill and pass any remaining arguments.
--all Mode
When invoked with --all, invoke each sub-skill via Skill in order:
dlc:securitydlc:qualitydlc:perfdlc:testdlc:pr-check(only if on a branch with an open PR)dlc:pr-validity(only if on a branch with an open PR)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 86 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 15d499e555f6
dlc is a skill published in the GitHub repository rube-de/cc-skills (10 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 837 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-strategy
Coverage-design method for qa-engineer — pyramid ratios per archetype, equivalence/boundary/property case selection, mutation score as the real coverage signal, and a flake-quarantine policy. Turns "coverage is 90%" (a number with no method) into a defensible test plan. Emits TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md, which the QA gate…
quant-validation
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness under overlapping labels, fractional differentiation, meta-labelling, and multiple-testing correction. Written because the invariants were required of…
eval-code-quality
Specialized code quality evaluator for the Evaluate-Loop. Use this for evaluating code implementation tracks where the deliverable is functional code — features, API routes, state management, utilities. Checks build integrity, type safety, code patterns, error handling, dead code, imports, test coverage, and naming…
nazgul:heartbeat
Run one Nazgul automation-heartbeat tick — triages the work inbox and auto-starts the next objective if idle. Opt-in and default-off; fired by an optional Claude Code native scheduled agent (routine) or run by hand. Use when asked to "run a heartbeat tick", "check the inbox", or to test/debug the heartbeat.
nazgul:docs
View, generate, or regenerate project documents (PRD, TRD, ADRs, test plans). Use when asked about project documentation, design decisions, or technical specs.
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…