Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ibrahimmian36/leanscreen --skill screengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ibrahimmian36/leanscreenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahimmian36/leanscreen/screen)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahimmian36/leanscreen/screen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ibrahimmian36/leanscreen/screen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ibrahimmian36/leanscreen/screen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ibrahimmian36/leanscreen/screen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00894 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
screen scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Subtle steeringlowPrompt injection
Instructions that bias recommendations or shape behaviour without the user noticing.
Never tell the user a statement "is faithful," "is correct," or "passed Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4ba69177e1c5
screen is a skill published in the GitHub repository ibrahimmian36/leanscreen (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 894 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (subtle steering). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
lean-expert
Lean 4 theorem-prover expertise for agents -- current versions, tactic cookbook, Mathlib search, compiler-error recoveries. Use when proving, debugging, or explaining Lean 4 proofs via leanforge-mcp.
lean-probe
Fast Lean 4 proof verification for coding agents via the LeanProbe MCP server's warm REPL. Use when you need to know whether Lean 4 code compiles (no errors, no sorry), iterate on a declaration inside a Lake/Mathlib project, test a replacement proof candidate, or explore a goal tactic by tactic — far faster than lake…
mathlib-api
Evidence-driven workflow for designing a Mathlib definition and the API around it. Use when adding a new structure/def intended for mathlib; when choosing between design alternatives (index type as field vs parameter, Set vs indexed family, coarse set vs finer indexed structure and when the fine one should exist at…
hypotheses
Turns a research direction into testable hypotheses with predictions, competing explanations and the experiments that discriminate between them, including the design (controls, randomization, blocking), sample size or seed count, the pre-specified analysis, and the result that would falsify each hypothesis. Use when a…
review-paper-code
Review research code for reproducibility and quality, extract the paper's main empirical claims, compare paper to code, and write a constructive markdown report. Designed for social science / economics projects with LaTeX papers and Stata, R, or Python code.
review-r
Read-only R code review protocol for .R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, tidyverse idioms, and professional standards; produces a report without editing. Use when user says "review this R script", "check the R code", "audit the analysis code", "code review on the R", or when an R file…