Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ihabkhaled/AI-Psychiatry --skill verification-controllergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihabkhaled/AI-PsychiatryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ihabkhaled/ai-psychiatry/verification-controller)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ihabkhaled/ai-psychiatry/verification-controller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ihabkhaled/ai-psychiatry/verification-controller.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00205 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
verification-controller scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verification Controller
Core principle
Verification is complete when each required condition has sufficient current proof; compulsive rechecking is prohibited.
Procedure
- List acceptance conditions requiring proof.
- Choose the smallest sufficient command or observation for each.
- Record result, scope, and timestamp or source state.
- Check whether later changes invalidated the proof.
- Reject equivalent reruns without relevant change or incomplete proof.
- Mark verification sufficient and continue or complete.
Required output
Condition-to-proof mapping, validity decision, and next unmet proof.
Limits
At most 2 equivalent passes without relevant change.
Common mistakes
Do not seek subjective certainty, recursively inspect unrelated paths, or repeat a check with different syntax.
Stop condition
Stop verification when all required proof is current or a specific missing proof is named.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 37 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 6954dc4dd65b
verification-controller is a skill published in the GitHub repository ihabkhaled/AI-Psychiatry (3 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 205 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
Use when an approved plan and task list exist and it is time to turn them into working, tested code — the SDD phase after analyze and before verify. Enforces TDD: a failing test comes before the code that makes it pass, one task at a time, appended to a progress ledger that survives compaction. Delegates test tooling…
python
Use when the task is Python itself, in any framework or none: PEP 695 generics, mypy --strict typing, dataclass/Protocol/TypedDict/Enum choices, asyncio.TaskGroup, stdlib idioms, src/ layout + pyproject.toml with uv, ruff+mypy+pytest gate. NOT a FastAPI/ASGI service (that is fastapi), NOT a deep pytest suite (that is…
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…
csharp-dotnet
Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or shipping C# / .NET code — ASP.NET Core APIs (minimal APIs vs controllers), EF Core data access, async correctness, solution layout in .cs/.csproj/.sln. NOT a Java/Spring backend (that is spring-boot), NOT a Node/TypeScript backend (that is nestjs), NOT framework-neutral REST…
debug
Use when something is broken — a failing or flaky test, crash, wrong result or regression — and the root cause must be reproduced and proven before any fix. On-demand; callable mid-implement. NOT a feature to spec or build (that is specify/implement), NOT the lint/test gate (that is verify), NOT adversarial diff…
e2e-testing
Use when writing or stabilizing Playwright tests that drive a real browser through multi-step journeys — durable locators, web-first assertions, storageState auth, trace/retries, and flakes that only bite in CI. NOT in-process component tests (that is testing-web), NOT WCAG auditing (that is accessibility), NOT the…