Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex --skill academic-research-suitegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium System Prompt Leakage · line 175 Skill contains patterns that could indirectly extract system prompts through rephrasing, translation, summarization, or side-channel techniques.Fix: Guard against indirect extraction by refusing to summarize, translate, or rephrase system instructions. Add explicit anti-extraction clauses.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 221 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00262 | $0.11189 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00105 | $0.04476 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00052 | $0.02238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01119 |
Grade A, and why
academic-research-suite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 292 B
- ars/.command-invariants.toml 1.1 KB
- ars/.gitattributes 381 B
- ars/.github/copilot-instructions.md 2.6 KB
- ars/.github/FUNDING.yml 29 B
- ars/.github/pull_request_template.md 1.9 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/changelog-covers-merges.yml 1.5 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/command-invariants.yml 2.0 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/defer-label-gate.yml 2.0 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/eval-harness.yml 7.7 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/freshness-check.yml 1.1 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/harness-retirement-monthly.yml 1.7 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/platform-port-reminder.yml 6.1 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/pr-closes-issue.yml 2.1 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/pytest.yml 1.8 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/release-cooldown.yml 4.7 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/repository-hygiene.yml 1.9 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/spec-consistency.yml 48 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/tag-version-match.yml 1.4 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/test-count-monotonic.yml 5.7 KB
- ars/.gitleaks.toml 3.2 KB
- ars/.gitleaksignore 641 B
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md 42 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md 33 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.md 42 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/eic_agent.md 28 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/field_analyst_agent.md 11 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md 44 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md 34 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/examples/hei_paper_review_example.md 34 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/examples/interdisciplinary_review_example.md 28 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/examples/subclaim_decomposition_example.md 8.3 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/calibration_mode_protocol.md 15 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/changelog.md 1.4 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/editorial_decision_standards.md 13 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/guided_mode_protocol.md 2.0 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/integration_guide.md 680 B
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/quality_rubrics.md 6.3 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/re_review_mode_protocol.md 52 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/review_criteria_framework.md 6.2 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/review_panel_provenance_protocol.md 9.4 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/review_quality_thinking.md 3.3 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/reviewer_sprint_prompt_source.md 48 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/sprint_contract_protocol.md 32 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/statistical_reporting_standards.md 30 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/top_journals_by_field.md 13 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/templates/editorial_decision_template.md 11 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/templates/peer_review_report_template.md 15 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/templates/revision_response_template.md 7.4 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/WORKFLOW.md 47 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md 12 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/argument_builder_agent.md 11 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/citation_compliance_agent.md 23 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/draft_writer_agent.md 56 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/formatter_agent.md 64 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/intake_agent.md 25 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/literature_strategist_agent.md 47 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md 29 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/revision_coach_agent.md 20 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md 28 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +31 lines d7703bf35245
- yesterday Changed · +9 lines cb47ac627219
- 11d ago Changed 5922ab7d20f2
- 24d ago Changed · +24 lines · +3 tokens per session 5a502f5c5d26
- 29d ago Changed · +83 lines · +37 tokens per session 5bb1cc037582
- 1mo ago Changed · +52 lines · -20 tokens per session 52c9b464fa1e
- 1mo ago Changed 58abbdc6100b
- 1mo ago First seen · 437 lines · 242 tokens per session scan A 90c49264f4a1
academic-research-suite is a skill published in the GitHub repository Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex (13,622 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 262 tokens to every session and 11,189 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-manager
Use this when starting a new research project or managing a complex, multi-step research workflow.
academic-writing
You must use this when producing any research prose — literature reviews, syntheses, analyses, methodology descriptions, discussion sections, abstracts, or any written output intended for an academic audience.
systematic-review
You must use this when conducting PRISMA-standard systematic reviews, protocol development, or Risk of Bias assessment.
hypothesis-testing
You must use this when formulating testable hypotheses, designing experimental controls, or defining falsification criteria.
peer-review
You must use this when critiquing academic manuscripts, evaluating methodological rigor, or providing structured reviewer feedback.
research-methodology
You must use this when matching research questions to appropriate designs, sampling strategies, or validity controls — or when a research problem is stuck and needs creative reframing (cross-domain analogies, first-principles deconstruction).