Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex --skill academic-research-suitegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex/academic-research-suite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium System Prompt Leakage · line 175 Skill contains patterns that could indirectly extract system prompts through rephrasing, translation, summarization, or side-channel techniques.Fix: Guard against indirect extraction by refusing to summarize, translate, or rephrase system instructions. Add explicit anti-extraction clauses.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 221 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00242 | $0.07438 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00121 | $0.03719 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01488 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00744 |
Grade A, and why
academic-research-suite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 292 B
- ars/.command-invariants.toml 1.1 KB
- ars/.gitattributes 381 B
- ars/.github/copilot-instructions.md 2.6 KB
- ars/.github/FUNDING.yml 29 B
- ars/.github/pull_request_template.md 1.9 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/changelog-covers-merges.yml 1.5 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/command-invariants.yml 1.8 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/defer-label-gate.yml 2.0 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/eval-harness.yml 7.7 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/freshness-check.yml 1.1 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/harness-retirement-monthly.yml 1.7 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/platform-port-reminder.yml 6.1 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/pr-closes-issue.yml 2.1 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/pytest.yml 1.8 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/release-cooldown.yml 4.7 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/repository-hygiene.yml 1.9 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/spec-consistency.yml 47 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/tag-version-match.yml 1.4 KB
- ars/.github/workflows/test-count-monotonic.yml 5.7 KB
- ars/.gitleaks.toml 3.2 KB
- ars/.gitleaksignore 641 B
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md 42 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md 32 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.md 40 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/eic_agent.md 28 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/field_analyst_agent.md 10 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md 44 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md 33 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/examples/hei_paper_review_example.md 34 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/examples/interdisciplinary_review_example.md 28 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/examples/subclaim_decomposition_example.md 8.3 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/calibration_mode_protocol.md 15 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/changelog.md 1.4 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/editorial_decision_standards.md 13 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/guided_mode_protocol.md 2.0 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/integration_guide.md 680 B
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/quality_rubrics.md 6.3 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/re_review_mode_protocol.md 51 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/review_criteria_framework.md 6.2 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/review_panel_provenance_protocol.md 9.4 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/review_quality_thinking.md 3.3 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/reviewer_sprint_prompt_source.md 48 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/sprint_contract_protocol.md 32 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/statistical_reporting_standards.md 30 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/references/top_journals_by_field.md 13 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/templates/editorial_decision_template.md 11 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/templates/peer_review_report_template.md 15 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/templates/revision_response_template.md 7.4 KB
- ars/academic-paper-reviewer/WORKFLOW.md 37 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md 7.7 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/argument_builder_agent.md 11 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/citation_compliance_agent.md 19 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/draft_writer_agent.md 51 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/formatter_agent.md 62 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/intake_agent.md 24 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/literature_strategist_agent.md 43 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md 29 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/revision_coach_agent.md 18 KB
- ars/academic-paper/agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md 28 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed 58abbdc6100b
- 13d ago First seen · 437 lines · 242 tokens per session scan A 90c49264f4a1
academic-research-suite is a skill published in the GitHub repository Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex (10,597 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 242 tokens to every session and 7,438 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-paper
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns…
academic-pipeline
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded…
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review…
deep-research
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question…
aaai-submission
Use when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.
acl-camera-ready
Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode…