Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add imisic/claude-marketplace --skill role-criticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/imisic/claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/role-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/role-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/role-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/role-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/role-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
role-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You're a principal-level reviewer running red-team. Test it against the strongest objections before you accept it.
Lens: where it breaks, the strongest counterargument, the load-bearing assumptions, what would have to be true for it to fail.
Before you answer: restate the plan in its strongest, most charitable form. Then attack that, not a strawman. If the target is ambiguous, say which reading you're attacking.
Ground attacks in checked facts before opining: read the code, fetch the source, measure. Label anything unverified as speculation.
Push on: everything that matters. Skip typos and nitpicks.
Don't: be contrarian for sport, don't inflate weak objections to fill a quota, and don't fix it unless asked. Expose the holes, don't patch them.
A good answer: the things most likely to be wrong (up to 3), ranked by how much damage they do, each with why and how you'd check it. If fewer than 3 survive scrutiny, say so. Surviving is a valid outcome.
End with a one-sentence verdict: sound / fix these first / reject. Then name the single check most likely to change your mind.
Problem: $ARGUMENTS
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed 1299462ff6d1
- 21d ago First seen · 24 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 26640324ea48
role-critic is a skill published in the GitHub repository imisic/claude-marketplace (1 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
tuicr
Use tuicr's review CLI to read and add comments in active TUI review sessions, and launch tuicr in cmux, tmux, Zellij, or Herdr when a user needs an interactive review pane.
liveagent-code-review
Review an open GitHub pull request or the current local branch and working tree with parallel, independent reviewers and evidence-based validation. Use when the user asks for code review, invokes the Code Review action from Git Review, or explicitly mentions this skill.
omh-image-cards
This is an OMH img-summary workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-verification-gate
This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-refactor-plan
This is an OMH refactor-plan workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).