Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add imisic/claude-marketplace --skill sanitize-publicgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/imisic/claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/sanitize-public)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/sanitize-public"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/sanitize-public/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/sanitize-public"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/imisic/claude-marketplace/sanitize-public.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00150 | $0.03300 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00060 | $0.01320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00660 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00330 |
Grade A, and why
sanitize-public scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
sanitize-public
The gate between a private working environment and anything other people can see. Most setups carry some private infrastructure worth keeping private (a LAN host, machine names, encrypted secrets, work that cannot be named publicly). Most of what gets authored is clean, but the cost of one leak crossing into a marketplace others clone onto their own machines is high and irreversible. This skill makes the check mechanical and repeatable instead of a thing you have to remember.
Why this exists (the marketplace fact that raises the stakes)
When someone installs a Claude Code plugin, the plugin directory is copied onto their machine, and relative-path plugins clone the whole marketplace repo. Whatever sits in that repo ships. The same is true of a downloadable content bundle (a tar.gz someone fetches) and any public repo. There is no "delete it later" once it is on other people's disks and in git history. So the scan runs on the artifact that will actually ship, not the source tree it came from.
When this fires (and when it does not)
Fires on:
- Building or updating a plugin marketplace repo, or adding a plugin to one
- Packaging a downloadable bundle or exporting content for publish
- Pushing a new public repo or gist, or sharing a skill/command with someone
- Explicit ask: "is this safe to publish," "scan before shipping," "make sure nothing private leaks," "check this bundle"
Does not fire on:
- Work that stays inside a private surface (private repos, local-only files, a private Claude config repo). Those are allowed to contain private data; that is the point of them.
- Routine editing that is not about to be published. Do not nag mid-draft.
If the destination is ambiguous, ask one question: "is this going somewhere the public can reach?" If yes, gate it.
Rebuild, do not redact (the rule that actually prevents leaks)
Never copy a private file into a public artifact and then remove the private parts. Redaction can only remove what you thought to look for, so it fails on the thing you did not think of, every time. The scanner is a backstop for when this rule is broken, not a substitute for it. A scanner finding means the process already failed.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed 8d0329edfc97
- 24d ago Changed · -4 lines debd483a1a2c
- 1mo ago Changed · +39 lines 61a1cd31277c
- 1mo ago First seen · 129 lines · 150 tokens per session scan A 1c7cad809749
sanitize-public is a skill published in the GitHub repository imisic/claude-marketplace (1 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 150 tokens to every session and 3,300 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tuicr
Use tuicr's review CLI to read and add comments in active TUI review sessions, and launch tuicr in cmux, tmux, Zellij, or Herdr when a user needs an interactive review pane.
liveagent-code-review
Review an open GitHub pull request or the current local branch and working tree with parallel, independent reviewers and evidence-based validation. Use when the user asks for code review, invokes the Code Review action from Git Review, or explicitly mentions this skill.
omh-image-cards
This is an OMH img-summary workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-verification-gate
This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-refactor-plan
This is an OMH refactor-plan workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).