Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp --skill instantcms-debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp/instantcms-debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp/instantcms-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp/instantcms-debug/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp/instantcms-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp/instantcms-debug.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00148 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00059 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
instantcms-debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
InstantCMS debug
Reproduce the smallest failing path and collect the exact error, request route, relevant files, InstantCMS version, and database state. Use explain_instantcms_project before loading unrelated files.
Run audit_instantcms_project, then inspect the specific hook, component API, route, or table implicated by evidence. Separate the root cause from secondary symptoms and do not modify code unless a fix was requested.
For fixes, use plan_project_changes, return a reviewable patch, and re-run the original reproduction plus validation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 66a1e6ee4dd5
instantcms-debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository instantcms-dev/instantcms-mcp (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 148 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Review one pull request for real bugs, regressions, and convention violations. Enumerate candidate issues across the whole diff, verify each against the code, then return structured line-anchored findings and a verdict. Read-only on GitHub; the orchestrator posts the review.
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
debugger
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
evidence-audit
Evidence-led audit/fix rounds for any codebase in any language. Finds only defects that a runnable proof reproduces on current code, applies the narrowest in-scope patch, verifies with a second proof, promotes high-risk proofs to permanent regression tests, and reports exact validation results. Use whenever the user…
bug-hunter
Use this skill when scanning source code for bugs, anti-patterns, code smells, or quality issues in a codebase, or when running a proof-driven bug hunt that must find, prove, fix, and verify one real defect. Trigger on the explicit vocabulary — "bug", "bug hunt", "/bughunt", "scan for issues", "find problems"…
debugging
Use this skill when something is broken and the cause is unknown — a failing test, a crash, an error message, wrong output, a regression, a hang, or behaviour that differs between environments — and it has to be found and fixed at the root. Also use it to build the failing proof for a suspected defect before fixing…