Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add InstituteforDiseaseModeling/idm_standards/plugin install idm-standardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.01273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00509 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
fix-project scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Apply fixes from whichever IDM audit reports exist in a project — dispatching fix-code for the code report and implementing documentation fixes directly.
Skill version: 2.0_2026.06.10
Step 1: Find the audit reports
In the project directory (argument, or current working directory), look for:
code_audit.md(or, for compatibility with earlier plugin versions,engineering_score.md)docs_audit.mdcode_audit_exhaustive.md
If the invoking context restricts scope (e.g. audit-docs chained here with "act on docs_audit.md only"), honor that. If none of the reports exist, stop and tell the user:
"No audit reports found. Please run
/idm-standards:audit-project(oraudit-code/audit-docs) first."
If more than one report exists and the scope wasn't restricted, confirm with the user via one AskUserQuestion (multiSelect) which reports to act on — default: all found.
Discover the user config following $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/reference/user-config.md (read it now). Apply its directives across both the code and docs fixes below: never implement a suppressed item (config wins over a stale report), but never skip a hard-floor fix (secrets, license, serious correctness).
Choose a version-control strategy once. Before any changes, ask the user with a single AskUserQuestion how to manage version control for this run, offering the same four options fix-code does: one branch + PR for everything, a branch + PR per priority group (smaller, easier-to-review PRs), commit on the current branch with no PR, or edit only, no git. Pass the chosen strategy into fix-code (Step 2) so it doesn't re-ask, and apply the same choice to the docs fixes (Step 3). Confirm branch name(s) before creating them and confirm before pushing or opening any PR. If the project is not a git repository, edit files directly and tell the user.
Step 2: Fix the code
If acting on code_audit.md: invoke the fix-code skill via the Skill tool, passing the project path and the version-control strategy chosen in Step 1 (so fix-code doesn't re-ask). fix-code discovers and applies the config itself, and handles its own planning, confirmation, implementation, and recording of proposed solutions (including the Tier 2/3 lock-artifact question).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 8f4f77a07c19
fix-project is a skill published in the GitHub repository InstituteforDiseaseModeling/idm_standards (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 1,273 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
sync-bridge
Reviews and guides Chromium Sync Model API (DataTypeSyncBridge) implementations, including DataTypeStore persistence and forwards/backwards compatibility for sync specifics. Use when implementing or reviewing a DataTypeSyncBridge subclass, DataTypeStore usage, sync metadata persistence, conflict resolution, or…
sync-model-processor
Reviews changes to Chromium Sync model internals in components/sync/model/, including ClientTagBasedDataTypeProcessor, ClientTagBasedRemoteUpdateHandler, ProcessorEntity, ProcessorEntityMetadata, and ProcessorEntityTracker. Use when modifying or reviewing processor state transitions, entity metadata tracking, conflict…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
gsd-ns-review
Invoke this Pi skill with /skill:gsd-ns-review.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…