Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add InstituteforDiseaseModeling/idm_standards/plugin install idm-standardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/institutefordiseasemodeling/idm_standards/fix-project.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.01273 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
fix-project scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Apply fixes from whichever IDM audit reports exist in a project — dispatching fix-code for the code report and implementing documentation fixes directly.
Skill version: 2.0_2026.06.10
Step 1: Find the audit reports
In the project directory (argument, or current working directory), look for:
code_audit.md(or, for compatibility with earlier plugin versions,engineering_score.md)docs_audit.mdcode_audit_exhaustive.md
If the invoking context restricts scope (e.g. audit-docs chained here with "act on docs_audit.md only"), honor that. If none of the reports exist, stop and tell the user:
"No audit reports found. Please run
/idm-standards:audit-project(oraudit-code/audit-docs) first."
If more than one report exists and the scope wasn't restricted, confirm with the user via one AskUserQuestion (multiSelect) which reports to act on — default: all found.
Discover the user config following $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/reference/user-config.md (read it now). Apply its directives across both the code and docs fixes below: never implement a suppressed item (config wins over a stale report), but never skip a hard-floor fix (secrets, license, serious correctness).
Choose a version-control strategy once. Before any changes, ask the user with a single AskUserQuestion how to manage version control for this run, offering the same four options fix-code does: one branch + PR for everything, a branch + PR per priority group (smaller, easier-to-review PRs), commit on the current branch with no PR, or edit only, no git. Pass the chosen strategy into fix-code (Step 2) so it doesn't re-ask, and apply the same choice to the docs fixes (Step 3). Confirm branch name(s) before creating them and confirm before pushing or opening any PR. If the project is not a git repository, edit files directly and tell the user.
Step 2: Fix the code
If acting on code_audit.md: invoke the fix-code skill via the Skill tool, passing the project path and the version-control strategy chosen in Step 1 (so fix-code doesn't re-ask). fix-code discovers and applies the config itself, and handles its own planning, confirmation, implementation, and recording of proposed solutions (including the Tier 2/3 lock-artifact question).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 69 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 8f4f77a07c19
fix-project is a skill published in the GitHub repository InstituteforDiseaseModeling/idm_standards (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 1,273 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
gsd-ns-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
cleanup-code-inspections
Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.
dorodango
Polishes working code through successive quality passes in fresh subagents. Use after tests pass when code needs multi-dimension refinement before release.