awesome-agv: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/ml-engineering/SKILL.md

ml-engineering is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from irahardianto/awesome-agv. It costs 29 tokens per session (601 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of guidelines for building machine-learning systems, from preparing data and training models to deploying and monitoring them. MLOps means the practices used to run machine-learning models reliably over time.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to design training and serving pipelines, engineer reusable features, track experiments, validate models, check fairness, register versions, and plan monitoring.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unreproducible experiments, inconsistent data processing, data leakage, weak evaluation, and models that are difficult to maintain after deployment.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is irahardianto/awesome-agv's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on awesome-agv itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything awesome-agv configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to irahardianto/awesome-agv. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/irahardianto/awesome-agv/main/.agents/skills/ml-engineering/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/irahardianto/awesome-agv

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ml-engineering

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/ml-engineering/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/ml-engineering)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/ml-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/ml-engineering/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ml-engineering

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/ml-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/awesome-agv/ml-engineering.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 601 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Agent Snooping · line 74
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 75
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.00601
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00300
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00120
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00060

Measured 10d ago against content hash 610d5c977833, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ml-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.agents/skills/ml-engineering/SKILL.md · 77 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ML Engineering Principles

Guidelines for building reliable, reproducible machine learning systems.

When to Invoke

  • Designing ML pipelines (training, serving)
  • Feature engineering and data preparation
  • Model evaluation and validation
  • MLOps infrastructure decisions

ML Pipeline Design

Stages

Data Collection → Feature Engineering → Training → Evaluation → Deployment → Monitoring

Principles

  1. Reproducibility — versioned data, code, and config. Same inputs = same model.
  2. Experiment tracking — every run logged (MLflow, W&B, Neptune).
  3. Feature stores — centralized feature computation, reusable across models.
  4. Model registry — versioned models with metadata, promotion workflow.

Feature Engineering

  1. Compute features once, reuse everywhere — feature store pattern.
  2. Training-serving skew prevention — same transformation code in training and inference.
  3. Feature documentation — every feature has description, source, freshness requirement.

Model Validation

Checklist

  • Performance metrics meet threshold (accuracy, F1, AUC, etc.)
  • No data leakage (target info in features)
  • Fairness evaluation across protected groups
  • Performance on edge cases and out-of-distribution data
  • Latency meets serving SLA
  • Model size within deployment constraints

Model Serving

Pattern When
Batch inference Scheduled predictions, large volumes, latency-tolerant
Real-time API Low-latency, per-request predictions
Streaming Continuous predictions on event streams
Edge On-device, offline-capable

Monitoring

  1. Data drift detection — statistical tests on input distributions.
  2. Model performance monitoring — track prediction accuracy over time.
  3. Feature importance drift — alert when feature contributions shift.
  4. Automated retraining triggers — retrain when performance degrades below threshold.

Tools Ecosystem

Read the full file on GitHub · 77 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 77 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 610d5c977833

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ml-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository irahardianto/awesome-agv (156 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 601 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prompt-engineering

Universal prompt engineering techniques for any LLM. Use when crafting, optimizing, or reviewing prompts for AI models. Triggers on requests like "improve this prompt", "write a system prompt", "optimize my instructions", "help me prompt engineer", "audit this prompt", "review my prompt", or when building agentic…

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · 76 tokens

compressed-system-prompts

How to refactor wordy, repetitive system prompts into high-density imperative token structures, cutting baseline system prompt costs by 70% while improving instruction adherence.

alivirgo/Major-AI-Skills · 36 tokens

add-provider

Checklist for adding a new AI provider (image, video, text, audio) that satisfies all 5 integration principles — ACL, bulkhead, idempotency, observability, and contract test. Load when integrating any new external AI API. Prevents the most common mistake of pasting httpx calls directly into a service.

yerdaulet-damir/vibe-coding-rules · 69 tokens

ai-engineering

Building production features powered by LLMs — model selection, prompt design as engineering, structured output, RAG, evals, cost/latency budgets, and guardrails. Use when adding AI features to a product (chat, extraction, summarization, classification, search), designing prompts that ship to production, building RAG…

05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills · 104 tokens

advanced-evaluation

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1 · 59 tokens

ai-engineering-toolkit

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1 · 47 tokens