Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add isvlasov/rageatc-oss --skill shapinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isvlasov/rageatc-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/shaping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/shaping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/shaping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/shaping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/shaping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00438 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
shaping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Shaping
A thinking-partner dialogue that takes a raw idea and shapes it into a concept document. Guides you through ideating, understanding the problem, and choosing an approach — adapting the flow based on where you are.
Default Flow
- Ideate — Explore and expand the idea (skill:
ideating) - Understand — Clarify the problem, intent, and success criteria (skill:
understanding-the-ask) - Solution — Evaluate approaches and commit to a direction (skill:
solutioning)
Follow this sequence by default. Skip or reorder only when there's a clear signal:
- User arrives with a well-formed problem statement → skip to step 2 or 3
- User is comparing specific options → skip to step 3
- Conversation reveals the problem isn't understood yet → return to step 2
How to Run
Be a thinking partner, not an interviewer. The dialogue should feel like a conversation between two people shaping something together — not a checklist being worked through.
- Load each skill as you enter its phase and follow its methodology
- Transition naturally — when one phase's goals are met, move on without announcing "now entering phase 2"
- Use the researcher-agent when the conversation would benefit from checking facts, exploring what exists, or comparing options — offer this when relevant
- Stay in dialogue — don't produce output until the user is ready to capture
Output
When the conversation reaches a natural conclusion, produce a concept document and save it to work/<task-id>/concept_v1.md.
Structure:
# <Concept Name>
## What
One paragraph describing what this is.
## Why
The problem or opportunity driving this.
## How
The chosen approach and key decisions made.
## Boundaries
What this is NOT. Scope limits.
## Open Questions
Unresolved items for future exploration.
Present the draft to the user for approval before saving.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 58 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 3afdb6e36adb
shaping is a skill published in the GitHub repository isvlasov/rageatc-oss (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 438 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-method
Use when starting any design task — resolves register, sets the 3 dials, locks Gate 0, and routes to the right move and target skill.
design-webapp
Use when building or extending a dashboard, SaaS screen, or any authenticated app surface — use design-web instead for a marketing site.
design-web
Use when building or revising a marketing/landing/campaign page, register brand locked at Gate 0 — use design-webapp for app screens instead.
laravel-architecture
Use when structuring a Laravel project, creating services/repositories/actions, implementing dependency injection, or organizing code layers.
laravel-billing
Use when implementing subscriptions, invoices, payment methods, webhooks, or billing portals with Laravel Cashier (Stripe or Paddle).
laravel-permission
Use when implementing RBAC, role-based access control, or user authorization with Spatie Laravel Permission.