understanding-the-ask

understanding-the-ask is a skill for Claude Code from isvlasov/rageatc-oss. It costs 35 tokens per session (761 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A conversation process for clarifying what someone actually needs before turning a request into formal requirements. It explores the goal, users, context, and consequences of not addressing the problem.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for vague or incomplete requests, especially before writing a project brief or deciding what to build.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of building the requested solution when the underlying need or expected outcome is still unclear.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the rageatc-core-oss plugin — 24 skills, 6 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it for vague or incomplete requests, especially before writing a project brief or deciding what to build.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add isvlasov/rageatc-oss --skill understanding-the-ask
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isvlasov/rageatc-oss

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install rageatc-core-oss, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 24 skills, 6 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for understanding-the-ask

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for understanding-the-ask

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/understanding-the-ask.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 761 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.00761
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00380
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00152
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00076

Measured 12d ago against content hash cbfaea16b576, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

understanding-the-ask scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rageatc-core-oss/skills/understanding-the-ask/SKILL.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Understanding the Ask

Discover what the user actually needs before requirements are formalised. Users often state solutions, not problems — explore intent, context, and constraints until the underlying need is clear, then hand off to creating-briefs.

Skip the full workflow when the request is already specific with stated outcomes, or the task is trivial with obvious intent.

Workflow

Step 1 — Capture the initial statement

Establish the surface request and basic context with open-ended questions:

  • "What are you looking to create or achieve?"
  • "Who will use this?"
  • "Where does this fit in your current work?"

Capture what they think they need — don't probe why yet. Prefer "what" and "how" openers; "why" can feel defensive.

Step 2 — Explore intent and motivation

Don't literally ask "why" five times; invite elaboration:

  • "What's driving this need right now?"
  • "What would having this enable you to do?"
  • "What happens if we don't address this?"

When the user proposes a specific solution, probe for the outcome behind it: "I need a comprehensive API reference" → "What would that reference enable your team to do?"

Premature-solutioning signals: specific tools before the problem is defined; fixation on a deliverable type; "we need X" without "because Y"; features before outcomes. Redirect: "Before we discuss how, can we clarify what problem that solves?" Some solution talk is fine — just make sure problem context exists first.

Stop when you reach fundamental goals or constraints (typically 3–5 exchanges): the user articulates a clear outcome, you understand the consequence of not solving it, and the need — not just the proposed solution — is clear.

Step 3 — State your understanding

Reflect back at key moments — after exploring intent, before brief creation, when uncertain about something specific — not after every statement:

"Let me state back what I understand:

  • Problem: [what's not working or missing]
  • Outcome: [what success looks like]
  • Constraints: [limitations, boundaries, must-haves]
  • Audience: [who will use this]

Read the full file on GitHub · 71 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 71 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A cbfaea16b576

Subscribe to this mod's changes

understanding-the-ask is a skill published in the GitHub repository isvlasov/rageatc-oss (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 761 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.