Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/commitnpx skills add ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config/commit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00749 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit Current Work
Working Directories
- Obsidian workspace (docs, plans, features):
__VAULT_ROOT__ - Codebase (all LE services):
__CODEBASE_ROOT__
Process
-
Check current branch:
git branch --show-current-
If on
mainormaster: NEVER commit directly. Analyze the diff to suggest a smart branch name:-
Run
GIT_EDITOR=true git diff --statto see changed files -
Infer type from changes:
- New files with business logic →
feat - Modified existing logic fixing a defect →
fix - Only test files →
test - Only config/CI/deps →
chore - Only
.mdfiles →docs - Restructuring without behavior change →
refactor - Performance-related changes →
perf
- New files with business logic →
-
Infer scope from file paths:
svc-experiences/...→svc-experienceswww-le-customer/...→www-le-customersrc/checkout/...→checkout- Multiple services → use the primary one or the shared module name
-
Infer description from the nature of changes (function names, file names, test names)
-
Present to user with context:
You are on main. Based on the diff: - Type: feat (new files with business logic) - Scope: svc-experiences (all changed files) - Suggestion: feat/svc-experiences-add-complementary-filter Use this branch or prefer a different name? -
Wait for the user's response before creating the branch with
git checkout -b <name>
-
-
If no branch exists (detached HEAD): analyze the diff and suggest a branch name before committing
-
-
Review changed files:
GIT_EDITOR=true git diff --stat -
Check each file is related to the current work (don't commit unrelated changes)
-
Stage relevant files by name (avoid
git add .) -
Write commit message
Commit Format
<type>(<scope>): <short description>
- Bullet point 1
- Bullet point 2
Types
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 108 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A d60c13acdcda
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ivanhoinacki/team-exp-claude-config (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,499 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-workflow-and-versioning
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, opening or reviewing a pull request (PR), pushing to a remote, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams. Use when cutting a release, choosing a semantic version bump…
git-advanced-workflows
Master advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking, bisect, worktrees, and reflog to maintain clean history and recover from any situation. Use when managing complex Git histories, collaborating on feature branches, or troubleshooting repository issues.
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
chinese-commit-conventions
中文 commit 与 changelog 配置参考——Conventional Commits 中文适配、commitlint/husky/commitizen 中文模板、conventional-changelog 中文配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-commit-conventions 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。.
block-no-verify-hook
Configure a PreToolUse hook to prevent AI agents from skipping git pre-commit hooks with --no-verify and other bypass flags. Use when setting up Claude Code projects that enforce commit quality gates.
managing-git
Manages Git workflows including branching, commits, and pull requests. Use when working with Git, creating commits, opening PRs, managing branches, resolving conflicts, or when asked about version control best practices.