code-review-checklist

code-review-checklist is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ivanshtokov/copilot-kit. It costs 18 tokens per session (632 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-review-checklist, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing software changes for correctness, security, speed, code quality, tests, and documentation. It also covers risks specific to code produced with AI.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a new feature, bug fix, or pull request. It guides checks for edge cases, injection attacks, repeated code, performance problems, tests, and updated documentation.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers catch bugs, unsafe input handling, exposed secrets, slow database access, missing tests, and misleading AI-generated logic before release.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review a new feature, bug fix, or pull request. It guides checks for edge cases, injection attacks, repeated code, performance problems, tests, and updated documentation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ivanshtokov/copilot-kit --skill code-review-checklist
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review-checklist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review-checklist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/code-review-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 632 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.00632
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00253
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00126
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00063

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4ef6f0e01c0c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to code-review-checklist — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.github/skills/code-review-checklist/SKILL.md · 109 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Checklist

Quick Review Checklist

Correctness

  • Code does what it's supposed to do
  • Edge cases handled
  • Error handling in place
  • No obvious bugs

Security

  • Input validated and sanitized
  • No SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
  • No XSS or CSRF vulnerabilities
  • No hardcoded secrets or sensitive credentials
  • AI-Specific: Protection against Prompt Injection (if applicable)
  • AI-Specific: Outputs are sanitized before being used in critical sinks

Performance

  • No N+1 queries
  • No unnecessary loops
  • Appropriate caching
  • Bundle size impact considered

Code Quality

  • Clear naming
  • DRY - no duplicate code
  • SOLID principles followed
  • Appropriate abstraction level

Testing

  • Unit tests for new code
  • Edge cases tested
  • Tests readable and maintainable

Documentation

  • Complex logic commented
  • Public APIs documented
  • README updated if needed

AI & LLM Review Patterns (2025)

Logic & Hallucinations

  • Chain of Thought: Does the logic follow a verifiable path?
  • Edge Cases: Did the AI account for empty states, timeouts, and partial failures?
  • External State: Is the code making safe assumptions about file systems or networks?

Prompt Engineering Review

// ❌ Vague prompt in code
const response = await ai.generate(userInput);

// ✅ Structured & Safe prompt
const response = await ai.generate({
  system: "You are a specialized parser...",
  input: sanitize(userInput),
  schema: ResponseSchema
});

Anti-Patterns to Flag

// ❌ Magic numbers
if (status === 3) { ... }

// ✅ Named constants
if (status === Status.ACTIVE) { ... }

// ❌ Deep nesting
if (a) { if (b) { if (c) { ... } } }

// ✅ Early returns
if (!a) return;
if (!b) return;
if (!c) return;
// do work

// ❌ Long functions (100+ lines)
// ✅ Small, focused functions

// ❌ any type
const data: any = ...

// ✅ Proper types
const data: UserData = ...

Read the full file on GitHub · 109 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 4ef6f0e01c0c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository ivanshtokov/copilot-kit (4 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 632 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to code-review-checklist, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens