Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ivanshtokov/copilot-kit/python-patternsnpx skills add ivanshtokov/copilot-kit --skill python-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivanshtokov/copilot-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.02232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01116 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00223 |
Grade A, and why
python-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to python-patterns — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 441 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Python Patterns
Python development principles and decision-making for 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.
⚠️ How to Use This Skill
This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.
- ASK user for framework preference when unclear
- Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
- Don't default to same framework every time
1. Framework Selection (2025)
Decision Tree
What are you building?
│
├── API-first / Microservices
│ └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)
│
├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin
│ └── Django (batteries-included)
│
├── Simple / Script / Learning
│ └── Flask (minimal, flexible)
│
├── AI/ML API serving
│ └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)
│
└── Background workers
└── Celery + any framework
Comparison Principles
| Factor | FastAPI | Django | Flask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | APIs, microservices | Full-stack, CMS | Simple, learning |
| Async | Native | Django 5.0+ | Via extensions |
| Admin | Manual | Built-in | Via extensions |
| ORM | Choose your own | Django ORM | Choose your own |
| Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |
Selection Questions to Ask:
- Is this API-only or full-stack?
- Need admin interface?
- Team familiar with async?
- Existing infrastructure?
2. Async vs Sync Decision
When to Use Async
async def is better when:
├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)
├── Many concurrent connections
├── Real-time features
├── Microservices communication
└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI
def (sync) is better when:
├── CPU-bound operations
├── Simple scripts
├── Legacy codebase
├── Team unfamiliar with async
└── Blocking libraries (no async version)
The Golden Rule
I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)
CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)
Don't:
├── Mix sync and async carelessly
├── Use sync libraries in async code
└── Force async for CPU work
Async Library Selection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 441 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A d77f136cd213
python-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository ivanshtokov/copilot-kit (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,232 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to python-patterns, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
article-writing
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
a-evolve
Apply A-Evolve's agentic evolution methodology to improve AI agent performance across runs. Use when the user wants to diagnose agent failures, generate targeted skills from error patterns, evolve system prompts, or accumulate episodic knowledge. Works standalone or inside AutoResearchClaw pipelines. Triggers on…
hive.chart-creation-foundations
Required reading whenever any chart tool is available. Teaches the one-tool embedding contract (call chartrender → live chart appears in chat AND a downloadable PNG lands in the queen session dir), the ECharts (data viz) vs Mermaid (structural diagrams) decision, the BI/financial-grade aesthetic baseline (no…
📝 任务完成后归档
重要提醒: 每次完成复杂调试或开发任务后,主动执行此流程! 将学到的经验归档为 skill,供以后参考。不要等用户提醒。.
deck-course-module
暖纸背景 + Playfair, 左侧学习目标常驻, 含 MCQ 自测页.
code-documenter
Use when adding docstrings, creating API documentation, or building documentation sites. Invoke for OpenAPI/Swagger specs, JSDoc, doc portals, tutorials, user guides.