Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add j4flmao/agent-skills --skill data-maskinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/j4flmao/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/j4flmao/agent-skills/data-masking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/j4flmao/agent-skills/data-masking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/j4flmao/agent-skills/data-masking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/j4flmao/agent-skills/data-masking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/j4flmao/agent-skills/data-masking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium analysis-evasion · line 1 Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script contentFix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.05334 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.02134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00533 |
Grade A, and why
backend-data-masking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 560 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Backend Data Masking
Purpose
Protect personally identifiable information (PII) using masking, encryption, tokenization, and anonymization techniques for GDPR/CCPA compliance.
Agent Protocol
Trigger
Exact user phrases: "data masking", "PII", "personally identifiable information", "encryption", "anonymization", "GDPR", "CCPA", "data privacy", "field-level encryption", "tokenization", "redaction", "data classification", "mask sensitive data".
Input Context
- Data model — which fields contain sensitive data.
- Classification of each field (PII, PCI, PHI, internal).
- Regulatory requirements (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, PCI-DSS).
Output Artifact
Data masking configuration or implementation code. No file unless requested.
Response Format
Field: {field name}
Classification: {PII|PCI|PHI|Internal}
Protection: {mask|encrypt|tokenize|anonymize|redact}
Completion Criteria
- All sensitive fields identified and classified.
- Protection strategy chosen per classification.
- Masking/encryption implemented at the application or database layer.
- Audit log of data access recorded.
- Right-to-deletion workflow for GDPR Article 17.
Max Response Length
3 lines per field. 15 lines for full plan.
Architecture Decision Tree
Which Protection Strategy?
Is the data needed for business operations?
├── Yes → Does the business need the original value?
│ ├── Yes → Encrypt (symmetric or asymmetric)
│ └── No → Tokenize (map to surrogate value)
├── No → Is the data needed for display/UI?
│ ├── Yes → Mask on read (partial display)
│ └── No → Is the data needed for analytics?
│ ├── Yes → Anonymize (statistically useful, not reversible)
│ └── No → Redact (remove entirely)
Where to Apply Protection?
Is the data at rest in a database?
├── Yes → Field-level encryption OR tokenization at write time
├── No → Is the data in transit in an API response?
│ ├── Yes → Mask or redact at the presentation layer
│ └── No → Is the data in logs?
│ ├── Yes → Redact entirely — never log PII
│ └── No → Is the data in a backup/export?
│ ├── Yes → Anonymize or encrypt
│ └── No → Apply at the closest boundary
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/data-classification.md 6.0 KB
- references/data-masking-advanced.md 7.1 KB
- references/data-masking-audit.md 7.7 KB
- references/data-masking-compliance.md 6.4 KB
- references/data-masking-fundamentals.md 5.7 KB
- references/data-masking-performance.md 7.3 KB
- references/data-masking-techniques.md 5.3 KB
- references/encryption-strategies.md 1.6 KB
- references/masking-patterns.md 1.7 KB
- references/pii-detection.md 5.1 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -1 lines aaa6be7371c8
- 1mo ago First seen · 561 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A ada555f55a48
backend-data-masking is a skill published in the GitHub repository j4flmao/agent-skills (34 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 5,334 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
privacy-compliance
Comprehensive global privacy compliance agent skill covering GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, HIPAA Privacy Rule, EU AI Act, LGPD, cross-border data transfer mechanisms (SCCs, BCRs, EU-US DPF), PII identification and classification, data minimization, consent management, privacy-by-design patterns, DPIA workflows, data subject access…
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
gdpr-compliance
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and…
iso42001
Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI…
nist-800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR…