Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add j5ik2o/okite-ai --skill refactoring-packagesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/j5ik2o/okite-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/j5ik2o/okite-ai/refactoring-packages)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/j5ik2o/okite-ai/refactoring-packages"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/j5ik2o/okite-ai/refactoring-packages/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/j5ik2o/okite-ai/refactoring-packages"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/j5ik2o/okite-ai/refactoring-packages.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00156 | $0.01133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.00566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
refactoring-packages scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
パッケージリファクタリング
既存コードのパッケージ/モジュール構造を分析し、改善提案と移行計画を作成・実行する。
ワークフロー
1. 現状分析 → 2. 問題特定 → 3. 改善提案 → 4. 移行計画
1. 現状分析
対象ディレクトリの構造を把握する。
使用ツール:
mcp__serena__list_dir: ディレクトリ構造の把握（recursive: true）mcp__serena__get_symbols_overview: ファイル内のシンボル把握mcp__serena__find_referencing_symbols: 依存関係の検出
確認ポイント:
- ディレクトリ深度（4階層以下が理想）
- ファイル数/ディレクトリ（10以下が理想）
- 命名規則の一貫性
2. 問題特定
references/analysis-patterns.mdを参照し問題を検出。
優先順位（高→低）：
- 循環依存（ビルド不可の原因）
- 神モジュール（変更影響が大きい）
- 散在機能（開発効率低下）
- 過度なネスト（可読性低下）
3. 改善提案
問題ごとの解決策はreferences/analysis-patterns.mdを参照。
4. 移行計画
段階的な移行計画を作成：
### Phase 1: 準備
- [ ] テストカバレッジ確認
- [ ] 依存関係マップ作成
### Phase 2: 構造変更
- [ ] 新ディレクトリ作成
- [ ] ファイル移動
- [ ] インポートパス更新
### Phase 3: 検証
- [ ] テスト実行
- [ ] ビルド確認
具体例
入力
ユーザー: 「auth/モジュールが肥大化している」
分析
auth/
├── mod.rs (800行) ← 神モジュール検出
├── jwt.rs
├── oauth.rs
└── session.rs
問題: mod.rsに認証ロジック、ミドルウェア、エラー型が混在
出力
# パッケージ構造分析レポート
## 検出された問題
1. **神モジュール**: auth/mod.rs (800行、3責務)
## 改善提案
### 提案1: 責務分離
- Before: auth/mod.rs に全ロジック
- After:
- auth/core.rs (認証ロジック)
- auth/middleware.rs (ミドルウェア)
- auth/error.rs (エラー型)
- 理由: 単一責任の原則適用、変更影響範囲の限定
## 移行計画
### Phase 1: 準備
- [ ] 既存テストの確認
### Phase 2: 分割
- [ ] auth/core.rs 作成、ロジック移動
- [ ] auth/middleware.rs 作成
- [ ] auth/error.rs 作成
- [ ] mod.rs を再エクスポートのみに
### Phase 3: 検証
- [ ] cargo test
- [ ] cargo clippy
関連スキル（併読推奨）
このスキルを使用する際は、以下のスキルも併せて参照すること：
package-design: リファクタリングの目標となるパッケージ設計原則ddd-module-pattern: DDD文脈でのリファクタリング目標構造intent-based-dedup: リファクタリング時の重複コード共通化判断
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 120 lines · 156 tokens per session scan A 3d0f495ce234
refactoring-packages is a skill published in the GitHub repository j5ik2o/okite-ai (81 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 1,133 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…