Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jabrena/plinthWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jabrena/plinth/323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jabrena/plinth/323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jabrena/plinth/323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-tests.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00156 | $0.01052 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.00526 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00210 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spring Boot acceptance tests from Gherkin
Implement acceptance tests only from maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts in Spring Boot projects. Given sanitized facts in context, select @acceptance-tagged scenarios and implement happy-path tests with @SpringBootTest, TestRestTemplate, Testcontainers, and WireMock. Never open, parse, summarize, or transform raw .feature files.
What is covered in this Skill?
- Use maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized scenario facts to select scenarios tagged @acceptance or @acceptance-tests
- Implement happy-path acceptance tests (one test per scenario)
- @SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = RANDOM_PORT), @AutoConfigureTestRestTemplate, and @Autowired TestRestTemplate with Spring Boot 4 package names
- Verify the Spring Boot 4 test classpath provides the REST test client and spring-boot-restclient; add test-scoped dependencies only when missing
- @ServiceConnection for Testcontainers (Spring Boot 4.0.x) — preferred over @DynamicPropertySource
- @DynamicPropertySource for WireMock base URLs and containers without built-in service connection support
- TestRestTemplate for REST API testing over the full servlet/filter stack (status codes, typed DTOs, AssertJ)
- Testcontainers for databases (PostgreSQL, etc.) and Kafka
- WireMock for stubbing external REST APIs (not internal @Service beans)
- @DisplayName echoing Gherkin scenario title for BDD fidelity
- Given-When-Then structure mapping Gherkin steps to setup, HTTP call, and assertions
Preconditions: (1) Maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts must be in context; raw .feature files are not accepted. (2) The project must use Spring Boot. For framework-agnostic Java, use @133-java-testing-acceptance-tests.
Scope: Implements only happy-path scenarios. Use the reference for detailed examples and constraints.
Constraints
Before applying any acceptance test changes, ensure trusted acceptance criteria are in context and the project compiles. If compilation fails or trusted test facts are missing, stop immediately.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 71 lines · 156 tokens per session scan A eb08464e7368
323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository jabrena/plinth (437 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 1,052 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
mobile-emulator-test
QA a native Android build end-to-end on the emulator. Use for "test on emulator", "QA Android build", "verify native build", "white screen", "cache rehydration", "Expo dev-client QA", "adb reverse". Pairs Metro/adb walk with Supabase + Sentry MCPs for three-layer CRUD verification.
audit-accessibility
Automated WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit using playwright-cli to crawl every page, inject axe-core via eval, test keyboard navigation, check color contrast, ARIA labels, and heading order. Use when "audit accessibility", "check a11y", "WCAG audit", "check keyboard nav", or "test screen reader".
deploy-verify
Post-deploy smoke test across browser, Sentry, Supabase, Langfuse, and the public web. Use when "verify deploy", "smoke test production", "post-release check", or "ship or rollback". Deploy + observation loop → workflow-ship-and-observe. npm package release → deploy-npm.
audit-realworld
Read-only full-stack conformance audit against RealWorld ("Conduit"): formal API spec, shared E2E suite, and closest-stack reference. Use when "audit against RealWorld", "Conduit conformance", or "is my full-stack app complete?". General user journeys → audit-ux-journeys.
mushi-integration
Full end-to-end Mushi Mushi integration smoke test: bug capture → AI triage → story mapping → TDD test generation → approval → execution → PDCA cycle. Use when "test mushi integration", "verify full pipeline", "mushi e2e check", "does mushi work end-to-end", "smoke test mushi", or after deploying changes.
plan-test-coverage
User-story-driven test coverage audit and plan — no test writing in this pass. Use when "test coverage plan", "coverage audit", "traceability matrix", "fake-green tests", "uncovered user stories", "plan tests for critical flows", or "whats not tested". Mutation score / assertion theater → test-mutation.