Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jeffsenso/prestashop-skills --skill write-playwright-campaignsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeffsenso/prestashop-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffsenso/prestashop-skills/write-playwright-campaigns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffsenso/prestashop-skills/write-playwright-campaigns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffsenso/prestashop-skills/write-playwright-campaigns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffsenso/prestashop-skills/write-playwright-campaigns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffsenso/prestashop-skills/write-playwright-campaigns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
write-playwright-campaigns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
write-playwright-campaigns
Read @.ai/Component/Playwright/CONTEXT.md for conventions (testIdentifier, baseContext, Mocha structure, POM usage).
1. Directory and naming
Place campaigns in tests/UI/campaigns/functional/BO/{XX_section}/{XX_subsection}/:
- Follow existing numbering convention (
XX_prefix) - Each campaign file:
XX_descriptiveName.ts - CRUD is typically
01_, filter is02_, bulk is03_, position is04_, tab-specific start at05_
2. Campaign boilerplate
Every campaign follows this structure:
import testContext from '@utils/testContext';
import {expect} from 'chai';
import {
boDashboardPage, boLoginPage, bo{Domain}Page, bo{Domain}CreatePage,
type BrowserContext, Faker{Domain}, type Page, utilsPlaywright,
} from '@prestashop-core/ui-testing';
const baseContext: string = 'functional_BO_{section}_{subsection}_{campaignName}';
describe('BO - {Section} : {Campaign description}', async () => {
let browserContext: BrowserContext;
let page: Page;
before(async function () {
browserContext = await utilsPlaywright.createBrowserContext(this.browser);
page = await utilsPlaywright.newTab(browserContext);
});
after(async () => {
await utilsPlaywright.closeBrowserContext(browserContext);
});
it('should login in BO', async function () {
await testContext.addContextItem(this, 'testIdentifier', 'loginBO', baseContext);
// ...login steps...
});
// ... test steps ...
});
3. CRUD campaign (01_CRUD{Domain}.ts)
- Create: navigate to add page, fill fields using
Faker{Domain}, save, assert success message - Verify in list: navigate to index, assert entity visible in grid
- Edit: navigate to edit, change fields, save, assert success message
- Verify edit: confirm updated values in grid
- Delete: click delete row action, confirm modal, assert entity removed
4. Filter/sort campaign (02_filterSort{Domain}s.ts)
- Create entities with distinct values for each filterable field
- For each filter: apply → assert matching rows → reset → assert all rows
- For each sortable column: sort ascending → verify order → sort descending → verify reverse
- Use data-driven patterns with
forEachfor multiple filter tests
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 128 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 3507c81d353f
write-playwright-campaigns is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeffsenso/prestashop-skills (5 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,106 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
133-java-testing-acceptance-tests
Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for framework-agnostic Java (no Spring Boot, Quarkus, Micronaut) — confirming @acceptance scenarios before coding, happy path with RestAssured, DB/Kafka test fixtures, WireMock for external REST only, and AT classes run by…
323-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-acceptance-tests
Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Spring Boot applications — including selecting scenarios tagged @acceptance, implementing happy path tests with TestRestTemplate, @SpringBootTest, Testcontainers with @ServiceConnection for…
423-frameworks-quarkus-testing-acceptance-tests
Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Quarkus applications — including @acceptance scenarios, @QuarkusTest, BaseAcceptanceTest with QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager for Testcontainers and WireMock, REST Assured for full HTTP pipeline testing, WireMock…
132-java-testing-integration-testing
Use when you need to set up, review, or improve Java integration tests — including generating a BaseIntegrationTest.java with WireMock for HTTP stubs, detecting HTTP client infrastructure from import signals, injecting service coordinates dynamically via System.setProperty(), creating WireMock JSON mapping files with…
322-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-integration-tests
Use when you need to write or improve integration tests — including Testcontainers with @ServiceConnection, @DataJdbcTest persistence slices, TestRestTemplate or MockMvcTester for HTTP, data isolation, and container lifecycle management for Spring Boot 4.0.x. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code…
422-frameworks-quarkus-testing-integration-tests
Use when you need to write or improve integration tests for Quarkus — including @QuarkusTest, Dev Services for automatic container provisioning, Testcontainers via QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager, WireMock for external HTTP stubs, @QuarkusIntegrationTest for black-box testing against packaged artifacts, REST…