Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jakubsuplicki/codument/work-stepnpx skills add jakubsuplicki/codument --skill work-stepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jakubsuplicki/codumentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jakubsuplicki/codument/work-step)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jakubsuplicki/codument/work-step"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jakubsuplicki/codument/work-step.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01954 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00977 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
work-step scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Work Step
Use this when the user says to continue, work the next step, or implement the approved plan.
Workflow
- Find the active plan in the relevant
docs/features/*.mdordocs/concepts/*.md. - Confirm the plan status is approved.
- Pick the first unchecked delivery-plan step.
- Surface the checklist in the live view (see Plan Checklist Mirror below): mirror the plan's steps into your host's native to-do panel with the step you are about to implement marked in progress, and run
codument steps --emitsocodument watchshows the active step. Post that checklist inline in the chat as well — the step just completed, the step now starting, and what remains — because the native to-do panel and the watch tape are not the chat transcript, and a run that does not wait between steps otherwise advances with no in-chat marker. - Read
docs/.registry.jsonbefore touching source files —codument context --plan <active-plan>pulls the grounded working set for every feature the plan routes to (owning docs, invariants with their test pointers, primary sources, one-hop deps) in one deterministic command, and--feature <slug>/--file <path>narrows it to the slice this step touches. When the question is only which doc owns this file — the one fact you need before editing it —--file <path> --owneranswers in a line instead of a pack, so the lookup is cheap enough to actually run rather than guess. Fall back to reading the registry directly if the CLI is unavailable. - Implement only that step.
- Use
tddor the strongest practical verification loop. - Register each NEW source file by running
codument map materialize <file>(see Feature Map Materialization), then update the mapped docs + registry as part of the same step. - Mark the step complete — in the plan doc, and in the mirrored native to-do list — only after verification passes. If this was the final step, compact the
## Delivery Planblock perplan-with-docs(Compaction on ship): lift surviving decisions into## Decisions/ADRs and any newly-true constraint into## Invariants & boundaries, then delete the delivery scaffolding so the durable doc is left in the standard's layers. - Proceed directly to
review-workfor this step without waiting. Never start the next delivery-plan step from here — review and commit come first, in either mode. - In gated mode, stop instead and present the user with end-of-step options:
- Run
review-worknow (recommended) - Make a specific correction to this step
- Pause here
- Run
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 73 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 960a02ae29a9
work-step is a skill published in the GitHub repository jakubsuplicki/codument (47 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,954 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vibe-workflow
Complete 5-step workflow to build an MVP from idea to launch. Use when the user wants to start a new project from scratch, go through the full workflow, or says "help me build an MVP", "start new project", or "vibe coding workflow".
project-butler
Project memory workflow for init/upgrade, profile-aware setup, end session, normal/full close, file organization, document archiving, language switching, versioned update logs, rule review, status, wiki sync, and context recovery. Use for /project-butler, setup/初始化, foundation setup, profile setup, end session/收工…
implement
Implement an approved plan. Write code, tests, and docs following the sprint checklist in NEXT-TASKS.md.
submit
Complete submission workflow - quality checks, commit, PR creation, changelog generation, and final push. Use after finishing implementation work.
trellis-workflow-enhancer
Audit and apply real, project-local Trellis integrations for Matt Pocock and Waza skills, with phase routing, hook injection, durable artifact handoffs, and smoke-test evidence. Use when a user wants to strengthen, compare, modernize, integrate, or debug Trellis with Matt/Waza workflows, especially when skills are…
import
Import a tasks.md into the coco tracker as an epic with dependencies, and create matching issues in the configured issue tracker.