Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill security-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalismWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/security-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/security-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/security-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/security-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/security-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 10 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Server-Side Request Forgery · line 65 Code accesses a cloud instance metadata endpoint (e.g. 169.254.169.254). A single request can return temporary IAM credentials, making this a high-value SSRF target for credential theft.Fix: Remove access to cloud metadata endpoints unless strictly required. If metadata is needed, restrict it (e.g. IMDSv2 with hop limit) and never expose returned credentials.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 111 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 121 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 122 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 126 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high YARA Match · line 159 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
- high Tool Misuse · line 265 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Output Handling · line 283 Model output is used without validation or sanitization. Unvalidated output injected into downstream contexts (SQL, shell, HTML) enables injection attacks and arbitrary code execution.Fix: Validate and sanitize all model output before using it in downstream contexts. Use parameterized queries for SQL, shell quoting for commands, and HTML encoding for web output.
- high Output Handling · line 290 Model output is used without validation or sanitization. Unvalidated output injected into downstream contexts (SQL, shell, HTML) enables injection attacks and arbitrary code execution.Fix: Validate and sanitize all model output before using it in downstream contexts. Use parameterized queries for SQL, shell quoting for commands, and HTML encoding for web output.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 63 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.07926 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.03963 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01585 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00793 |
Grade B, and why
security-checklist scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointmediumServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
- [ ] SSRF defenses: outbound allowlist for any URL fetched server-side; no `localhost`, `127.0.0.0/8`, link-local (`169.254.0.0/16`), or cloud metadata IP (`169.254.169.254`) fetches; DNS rebinding protection on resolve Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
The Node child_process module exposes a shell-execution primitive (the one that runs a command string through `/bin/sh`) and an argv-list primitive (the spawn family with `shell: false`). For any input that touches user How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 536 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security checklist
Pre-deployment security audit organized around the OWASP Top 10:2025 categories (released late 2025, succeeding the 2021 edition). This is the baseline that prevents obvious disasters, not a substitute for a real penetration test or threat model. For verification depth beyond this checklist, see OWASP ASVS 5.0 (https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/). For API-specific scope, see OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 (https://owasp.org/API-Security/editions/2023/en/0x00-header/).
Step 0: Research the current security landscape (do this first)
Security knowledge ages on a 6-12 month half-life. The recipes below were last verified on 2026-05-08; they may be stale by the time you read this. Before applying any pattern in this skill, fan out research scoped to the OWASP Top 10:2025 categories being audited so the recipes are interpreted against current authoritative sources, not against this file's snapshot.
Default-on, with a documented skip
Run the 4-angle research below by default. Skip ONLY when ALL of these hold:
- (a) You ran this same skill on this same primitive within the last 4 hours of the current session,
- (b) That prior research surfaced no urgent advisories for the OWASP Top 10:2025 categories being audited,
- (c) You log a one-line
Research skipped because <reason>note in your response.
"I think I know" / "moving fast" / "user wants this done quickly" / "already familiar" are NOT valid skip reasons. The whole point of this preamble is that future-you should not trust this skill body's defaults until current state is checked.
Fan out 4 subagents in parallel
Each subagent returns ≤300 words of bullets with citations. Dispatch all 4 in a single message so they run concurrently.
Angle 1, Authoritative standards. Have NIST / OWASP / IETF (RFCs and Internet-Drafts) / W3C / CISA published anything new about the OWASP Top 10:2025 categories being audited in the last 6-12 months? Look for: spec finalizations, deprecations, replacement specs, RFC publications, draft revisions, NIST SP updates, OWASP project version bumps. Cite by document number + publication date.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 536 lines · 28 tokens per session scan B 84e7f0bd66db
security-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository jamditis/claude-skills-journalism (389 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 7,926 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (cloud metadata endpoint, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
food-research
Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for food & nutrition science. Use when the user wants to research a food/nutrition topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, screen and synthesize many sources, verify citations, or scope a systematic review.…
data-table-formatter
Formats raw or messy data into a clean, publication-ready table with appropriate headers, sorted rows, consistent number formatting, and a source note — ready to drop into an article, report, or web page.
food-chemistry
Author-guideline skill for Food Chemistry (Elsevier, ISSN 0308-8146). Use when preparing, formatting, or checking a manuscript for submission to Food Chemistry — structure, word/abstract limits, Highlights, graphical abstract, Elsevier numbered (Vancouver) references, and figure specs. Triggers: submit to Food…
springer-food
Shared author-guideline skill for Springer / Springer Nature food journals: Food Engineering Reviews, Food and Bioprocess Technology, Food Security, and the SpringerOpen journal Food Production Processing and Nutrition. Use to format or check a manuscript for a Springer food journal — structure, abstract/keyword…
wiley-food
Shared author-guideline skill for Wiley food & nutrition journals: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, Food Frontiers, eFood, Legume Science, Food and Energy Security, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Journal of Food Biochemistry, Food Science & Nutrition. Use to format or check a manuscript for…
annu-rev-food
Author-guideline skill for Annual Review of Food Science and Technology (Annual Reviews, ISSN 1941-1413). Use to format or check an invited review for this journal — review structure, author–date Annual Reviews references, and figure specs. Triggers: submit to Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, Annual…