Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill comprehensive-test-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/comprehensive-test-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/comprehensive-test-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/comprehensive-test-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/comprehensive-test-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/comprehensive-test-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00529 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
comprehensive-test-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Comprehensive Test Review
Perform test review for the specified test files or directories.
Test Review Process
Standard Checklist
Coverage Requirements:
- Minimum 80% line and branch coverage
- Critical paths have 95%+ coverage
- All public functions have at least one test
- Edge cases are explicitly tested
Test Quality:
- Tests follow AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) pattern
- Test names describe behavior, not implementation
- Each test verifies one logical unit
- Tests are isolated and independent
Mocking Standards:
- Uses the project's mocking framework appropriately
- Mocks are scoped appropriately
- No over-mocking of implementation details
- External dependencies are properly stubbed
Type Safety:
- All fixtures have complete type hints
- Test functions have explicit return types
- Using modern language features for type annotations
Additional Examination Points
Beyond the standard checklist:
- Execution Time: Identifying slow tests for optimization
- Flaky Patterns: Tests dependent on timing, order, or external state
Analysis Process
- Gather test files in specified path
- Run coverage analysis with
{test command from language manifest} - Check each test against the standard checklist
- Identify gaps in coverage and quality
- Generate recommendations prioritized by impact
Output Format
Provide findings in this structure:
## Test Review Summary
### Coverage Analysis
- Overall: X%
- Critical modules: Y%
- Gaps identified: [list]
### Quality Issues
**HIGH Priority:**
- [Issue with location and fix]
**MEDIUM Priority:**
- [Issue with recommendation]
**LOW Priority:**
- [Minor improvements]
### Recommendations
1. [Prioritized action items]
Related Skills
- analyze-test-failures: Detailed analysis of specific test failures
- test-failure-mindset: Set investigative approach for session
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 88 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 91374265c901
comprehensive-test-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills (66 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 529 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.