Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill planner-rt-icagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/planner-rt-ica)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/planner-rt-ica"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/planner-rt-ica/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/planner-rt-ica"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/planner-rt-ica.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 158 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 159 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00158 | $0.05109 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00079 | $0.02554 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01022 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00511 |
Grade A, and why
planner-rt-ica scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 381 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Planner RT-ICA (Planning-Phase Input Completeness Analysis)
Sister skill — when to use which
| If you are… | Load |
|---|---|
| Grooming a backlog item, generating a plan, decomposing tasks under uncertainty | dh:planner-rt-ica (this skill — non-blocking) |
| At the S2 implementation gate where missing inputs must halt the pipeline | dh:rt-ica (the blocking sister skill) |
dh:planner-rt-ica and dh:rt-ica are deliberately split: same framework, different cost-of-being-wrong. During planning, a MISSING condition is a research task. At the implementation gate, the same MISSING is a halt event because the agent would otherwise guess.
Role
This skill adapts RT-ICA for planning contexts.
Its purpose is NOT to block planning. Its purpose is to prevent invented requirements while still allowing a correct dependency-first plan to be produced.
This skill runs as a pre-pass before task decomposition and task writing.
Complexity Model
Task complexity is the ratio of project-specific knowledge required to context window available — not implementation difficulty.
Training data covers craft knowledge (language patterns, tooling, frameworks). That is free. What consumes context budget is project-specific knowledge: schemas, pin-outs, conventions, power constraints, existing interfaces, user preferences. This knowledge must be loaded before an agent can act.
The planner should use this when sizing tasks:
flowchart TD
Conditions["Conditions from RT-ICA"] --> Estimate["For each task: estimate how much<br>project-specific context the executor<br>must load to satisfy its conditions"]
Estimate --> Shared{Do multiple tasks<br>need the same<br>knowledge loaded?}
Shared -->|Yes| Combine["Combine into one task —<br>knowledge loaded once,<br>both steps execute in<br>remaining window space"]
Shared -->|No| Size{Knowledge payload<br>vs context window?}
Size -->|"Fits with room to work"| Single["Single task"]
Size -->|"Leaves little room"| Split["Decompose along<br>knowledge boundaries —<br>each subtask needs a<br>smaller knowledge subset"]
Combine --> Annotate
Single --> Annotate
Split --> Annotate
Annotate["Annotate each task with<br>its knowledge requirements<br>so the executor knows<br>what to load"]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +20 tokens per session f5afc93a2190
- 7d ago First seen · 381 lines · 138 tokens per session scan A 9dac75c45d92
planner-rt-ica is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills (66 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 158 tokens to every session and 5,109 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…