Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill defi-amm-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/defi-amm-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/defi-amm-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/defi-amm-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/defi-amm-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/defi-amm-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01123 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00449 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
defi-amm-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to defi-amm-security — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DeFi AMM Security
Critical vulnerability patterns and hardened implementations for Solidity AMM contracts, LP vaults, and swap functions.
When to Use
- Writing or auditing a Solidity AMM or liquidity-pool contract
- Implementing swap, deposit, withdraw, mint, or burn flows that hold token balances
- Reviewing any contract that uses
token.balanceOf(address(this))in share or reserve math - Adding fee setters, pausers, oracle updates, or other admin functions to a DeFi protocol
How It Works
Use this as a checklist-plus-pattern library. Review every user entrypoint against the categories below and prefer the hardened examples over hand-rolled variants.
Examples
Reentrancy: enforce CEI order
Vulnerable:
function withdraw(uint256 amount) external {
require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);
token.transfer(msg.sender, amount);
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
}
Safe:
import {ReentrancyGuard} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
import {SafeERC20} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol";
using SafeERC20 for IERC20;
function withdraw(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant {
require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount, "Insufficient");
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
token.safeTransfer(msg.sender, amount);
}
Do not write your own guard when a hardened library exists.
Donation or inflation attacks
Using token.balanceOf(address(this)) directly for share math lets attackers manipulate the denominator by sending tokens to the contract outside the intended path.
// Vulnerable
function deposit(uint256 assets) external returns (uint256 shares) {
shares = (assets * totalShares) / token.balanceOf(address(this));
}
// Safe
uint256 private _totalAssets;
function deposit(uint256 assets) external nonReentrant returns (uint256 shares) {
uint256 balBefore = token.balanceOf(address(this));
token.safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), assets);
uint256 received = token.balanceOf(address(this)) - balBefore;
shares = totalShares == 0 ? received : (received * totalShares) / _totalAssets;
_totalAssets += received;
totalShares += shares;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 161 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 0d3fd55d9536
defi-amm-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (91 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,123 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to defi-amm-security, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
redteam
Expertise in offensive security research, vulnerability analysis, CMS-focused application testing, and red team operations.
redteam-exploit-validation
Focused workflow for validating exploitability safely and turning candidate issues into reproducible, bounded proof.
redteam-recon
Focused reconnaissance workflow for authorized security assessments, bug bounty triage, lab targets, and CTF infrastructure.
redteam-reporting
Focused reporting workflow for converting verified red-team work into clear, reproducible assessment artifacts.
redteam-source-audit
Focused source-code security review workflow for web applications, CMS extensions, APIs, and supporting services.
redteam-cms
Focused methodology for authorized CMS fingerprinting, component inventory, misconfiguration review, and vulnerability validation.