AuC is a Python framework for running a single AI agent with an asynchronous, pluggable reasoning loop, language-model adapters, permission levels, and observable events. It is used to build coding and conversational agents with tools, security checks, web interfaces, background jobs, evaluations, and isolated execution. The catalogue entries are skills for extending its agent workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ufy2024/AuC --skill defi-amm-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ufy2024/AuCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/defi-amm-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/defi-amm-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ufy2024/auc/defi-amm-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/defi-amm-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ufy2024/auc/defi-amm-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 21 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01313 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00656 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
defi-amm-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
7 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- defi-amm-security — 89% identical, 29 lines differ
- defi-amm-security — 86% identical, 29 lines differ
- defi-amm-security — 86% identical, 29 lines differ
- defi-amm-security — 86% identical, 34 lines differ
- defi-amm-security — 86% identical, 28 lines differ
- defi-amm-security — 86% identical, 29 lines differ
- defi-amm-security — 86% identical, 34 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DeFi AMM Security
Critical vulnerability patterns and hardened implementations for Solidity AMM contracts, LP vaults, and swap functions.
When to Use
- Writing or auditing a Solidity AMM or liquidity-pool contract
- Implementing swap, deposit, withdraw, mint, or burn flows that hold token balances
- Reviewing any contract that uses
token.balanceOf(address(this))in share or reserve math - Adding fee setters, pausers, oracle updates, or other admin functions to a DeFi protocol
How It Works
Use this as a checklist-plus-pattern library. Review every user entrypoint against the categories below and prefer the hardened examples over hand-rolled variants.
Execution Safety
The shell commands in this skill are local audit examples. Run them only in a trusted checkout or disposable sandbox, and do not splice untrusted contract names, paths, RPC URLs, private keys, or user-supplied flags into shell commands. Ask before installing tools or running long fuzzing/static-analysis jobs that may consume significant local or paid resources.
Never include secrets, private keys, seed phrases, API tokens, or mainnet signing credentials in command examples, logs, or reports.
Examples
Reentrancy: enforce CEI order
Vulnerable:
function withdraw(uint256 amount) external {
require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);
token.transfer(msg.sender, amount);
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
}
Safe:
import {ReentrancyGuard} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
import {SafeERC20} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol";
using SafeERC20 for IERC20;
function withdraw(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant {
require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount, "Insufficient");
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
token.safeTransfer(msg.sender, amount);
}
Do not write your own guard when a hardened library exists.
Donation or inflation attacks
Using token.balanceOf(address(this)) directly for share math lets attackers manipulate the denominator by sending tokens to the contract outside the intended path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 187 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A cd77ef2ddc24
defi-amm-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ufy2024/AuC (1,090 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,313 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
signature-replay
Signature replay attacks — missing nonces, missing chain ID, ecrecover zero address, signature malleability, cross-chain replay.
official-sui-skills
Pointer to the official Mysten Labs skills for building on Sui — language fundamentals, object model, PTBs, SDKs, publishing, upgrades, frontend integration, accessing on-chain data. Maintained upstream at github.com/MystenLabs/skills; pinned to the same ref the audit catalog derives from (see…
crypto-market-rank
Crypto market rankings and leaderboards. Query trending tokens, top searched tokens, Binance Alpha tokens, tokenized stocks, social hype sentiment ranks, smart money inflow token rankings, top meme token rankings from Pulse launchpad, and top trader PnL leaderboards. Use this skill when users ask about token rankings…
trading-signal
Subscribe and retrieve on-chain Smart Money signals. Monitor trading activities of smart money addresses, including buy/sell signals, trigger price, current price, max gain, and exit rate. Use this skill when users are looking for investment opportunities — smart money signals can serve as valuable references for…
bridge
Cross-chain token transfers using Wormhole and CCTP.
onchainkit
Build onchain apps with Coinbase's OnchainKit React components - wallets, swaps, NFTs, payments.