Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JanYork/llm-wiki-cli --skill using-discussiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JanYork/llm-wiki-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/janyork/llm-wiki-cli/using-discussion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/janyork/llm-wiki-cli/using-discussion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/janyork/llm-wiki-cli/using-discussion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/janyork/llm-wiki-cli/using-discussion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/janyork/llm-wiki-cli/using-discussion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00982 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00491 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
using-discussion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persistent discussion
When a user requests or enters iterative clarification/brainstorming, use this protocol alongside the active domain Skill (including grill-me, grilling or superpowers). No name allowlist. Do not initiate questions merely to use it. Reuse the authorized project SQLite and current Hook's opaque agent context. Never manufacture another context, initialize a missing Wiki, or install tooling solely to record. An unavailable store is a capture limitation, not permission to pretend the conversation is saved. Without a resolved context, disclose the gap.
Use lwc contract discussion once for the exact schema and example. CLI
lwc discussion apply --json - and MCP lwc_discussion action apply share it.
MCP always requires the current absolute projectPath. Never pass shell-interpolated
user text: serialize JSON to stdin or structured MCP arguments.
- Recover
discussion current --context CONTEXTbefore starting or after a compact/restart. No binding means start a discussion with a unique ID, title, description and stable request ID. The firststartbinds only this context. - Save each question and options with stable IDs before displaying identical text. Question preparation is not proof of display. Only report delivery with a host message reference; it remains reported evidence.
- On each user reply, persist exact visible text before analysis or another
question. An
answerreferences its parent question; multiple messages have separate IDs. If association is ambiguous usereplyand latermoveit to a question. Preserve multi-question original responses; never invent a split. - Read unassigned host replies first to avoid duplicate recording. Message IDs deduplicate supplied host events; unsupported/missing IDs fall back to this Agent protocol, never a guarantee of complete host capture. Do not reread full transcripts or store expanded prompts, tools, system text or reasoning.
- Batch the preceding answer and next question when possible. Use the last receipt's revision and one stable request ID. On uncertain result retry the identical input; on conflict reload and reconcile. Never blindly replay with a new ID. Successful receipts are silent: no logging commentary is necessary.
- On persistent failure, notify the user once that capture is incomplete and
keep retrying only within the task's scope. Do not continue claiming durable
capture. For excluded secrets submit a
gapwith a nonsensitive description; never store the secret in the reason, ID or retry log. This is an explicit exception for visible Discussion records, not general prompt logging.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 73 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A c1d25d4a3cdf
using-discussion is a skill published in the GitHub repository JanYork/llm-wiki-cli (54 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 982 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
cortex-profile
View and manage your cognitive profile — how you think, work patterns, blind spots, and cross-domain connections. Use when the user says 'show my profile', 'how do I work', 'what are my patterns', 'cognitive style', 'blind spots', 'methodology', or at the start of a session to load context. Also use 'rebuild profile'…
Promote
Take a slice of the current conversation and promote it to a durable vault artifact — concept note, project update, person profile, or doctrine entry. Pairs with /close. /close writes the daily note (transient outcome record); /promote elevates specific insights to permanent vault content the framework can refer back…
open
Boot the session, load context from the vault, and surface what matters.
capsule-compact
Compact a long capsule chain. Walks parentcapsuleid backward from a head capsule; if chain >= 5, summarizes oldest 3 into a chain-summary capsule. Manual invocation.
close-my-loops
Build and maintain a personal work profile and open-loop tracker for the user's own job — a markdown file covering their org, key contacts, communication style, active initiatives, and open loops synthesized from their own email/Slack; a Cowork Project setup so that file is actually read every session; a scheduled…
context-efficient-coding
Use ContextFlux to minimize coding-agent context and tool calls when exploring, planning, debugging, reviewing, or modifying an unfamiliar or multi-file repository. Trigger for codebase discovery, symbol search, architecture questions, cross-file changes, error tracing, review feedback, test discovery, or any request…