Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jasoncodemaker/agentic-research-control-panel/research-resourcenpx skills add JasonCodeMaker/Agentic-Research-Control-Panel --skill research-resourcegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JasonCodeMaker/Agentic-Research-Control-PanelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasoncodemaker/agentic-research-control-panel/research-resource)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasoncodemaker/agentic-research-control-panel/research-resource"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jasoncodemaker/agentic-research-control-panel/research-resource.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.02268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00454 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
research-resource scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 267 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 00da640f4140
research-resource is a skill published in the GitHub repository JasonCodeMaker/Agentic-Research-Control-Panel (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,268 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
optimize
Drive structured autoresearch iteration after evo:discover and the baseline commit. Use when the user invokes /evo:optimize or asks to try ideas, try variants, run experiments, use available GPUs, improve the current best/frontier, continue an evo search, or compare candidate changes in an evo workspace. The…
arbor-agent-orchestrator
Top-level controller for recreating the open-source AutoResearch workflow as a suite of skills. Use when the user asks to run, emulate, extract, validate, or refine Arbor/AutoResearch behavior, especially when a coordinator must load phase skills for setup, ideation, executors, merge evaluation, novelty search…
anti-autoresearch
End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) →…
baseline-comparison-audit
Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent…
eval-design-forensics
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan…
experiment-forensics
Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope…