Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jasonkneen/kiro --skill quality-assurancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasonkneen/kiro/quality-assurance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasonkneen/kiro/quality-assurance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jasonkneen/kiro/quality-assurance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasonkneen/kiro/quality-assurance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jasonkneen/kiro/quality-assurance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01950 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00975 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
quality-assurance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quality Assurance
Ensure quality throughout the spec-driven development process with validation techniques, quality gates, and testing strategies.
When to Use This Skill
Use quality assurance practices when:
- Completing any spec phase (requirements, design, tasks)
- Transitioning between phases
- Implementing features from specs
- Reviewing completed work
- Establishing team quality standards
Core Principles
- Requirements-Driven Testing: Every test traces to a requirement
- Phase-Appropriate Validation: Different techniques for each phase
- Continuous Quality: Checks throughout development
- Automated Where Possible: Reduce manual effort
- Fast Feedback: Catch issues early
Phase-Specific Validation
Requirements Phase Validation
Quality Checklist:
- All user stories have acceptance criteria
- Requirements are unambiguous and specific
- Each requirement can be validated/tested
- EARS format used consistently
- Requirements link to business objectives
- No conflicting requirements
Review Process:
- Self Review: Author checks completeness
- Stakeholder Review: Business validates requirements
- Technical Review: Team assesses feasibility
- Approval: Formal sign-off before design
Validation Techniques:
- Scenario Walkthroughs: Step through user journeys
- Edge Case Analysis: Identify boundary conditions
- Conflict Detection: Check for contradictions
- Completeness Analysis: Ensure all needs covered
Design Phase Validation
Quality Checklist:
- Design addresses all requirements
- Scalability considerations documented
- Maintainability assessed
- Security addressed
- Performance requirements considered
- External integrations defined
Review Process:
- Architecture Review: Senior team validates design
- Security Review: Security implications assessed
- Performance Review: Performance characteristics evaluated
- Integration Review: External dependencies validated
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 333 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 22464717fcaa
quality-assurance is a skill published in the GitHub repository jasonkneen/kiro (746 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,950 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.