address-pr-comments

address-pr-comments is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from jaybocc2/dotfiles. It costs 42 tokens per session (526 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Address review comments on a GitHub pull request. Use when the user asks to "address PR comments", "respond to review feedback", "handle reviewer comments", or "resolve review threads".

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jaybocc2/dotfiles/address-pr-feedback
Any agent
npx skills add jaybocc2/dotfiles --skill address-pr-feedback
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaybocc2/dotfiles

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for address-pr-comments

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaybocc2/dotfiles/address-pr-feedback.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaybocc2/dotfiles/address-pr-feedback)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaybocc2/dotfiles/address-pr-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaybocc2/dotfiles/address-pr-feedback.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 526 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00042 $0.00526
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.00263
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00105
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00053

Measured yesterday against content hash 949174803884, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

address-pr-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

gemini/skills/address-pr-feedback/SKILL.md · 62 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Address PR Review Comments

Context

  • Current branch: !git branch --show-current
  • get pull request review with gh cli

Your task

Work through every unresolved review thread on this PR systematically. For each thread:

Step 1 — Understand the comment

Read the comment carefully. Identify:

  • What file and line it refers to
  • What the reviewer is asking for (change, question, clarification, nitpick)
  • Whether a code change is actually required

Step 2 — Make changes if needed

If a code change is warranted:

  • Read the relevant file(s) first
  • Make the change using Edit (or Write for new files)
  • Do NOT commit yet — collect all changes first

If no change is needed (e.g. the reviewer asked a question, or you disagree), prepare a clear explanation.

Step 3 — Commit each change separately

After addressing a comment that requires code changes, create a single follow-up commit. Write a short message that summarizes what was changed (e.g. "fix: use const for immutable bindings per review") rather than a generic message:

Skip this step if no code changes were made. Provide a commit message and wait until prompted to continue if not allowed by policy to commit.

Step 4 — Reply to each comment

use gh cli

Good reply patterns:

  • For changes made: "Done — ."
  • For questions answered: "< direct answer to question >."
  • For declined suggestions: "I kept the existing approach because ."
  • For issues already resolved in code: "I fixed this in "

Step 5 — Resolve each thread

Resolve every thread/comment if satisfactory use gh cli and GraphQL id field:

gh api graphql -f query='mutation { resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "<thread_id>"}) { thread { id isResolved } } }'

Notes

  • break down commits by units of work
  • commits should be broken down into logical parts
  • do not group unrelated changes into a single commit
  • If the PR has no open review threads, report that there is nothing to address
  • Always reply before resolving so the reviewer sees the response
  • Keep replies concise and direct

Read the full file on GitHub · 62 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 62 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 949174803884

Subscribe to this mod's changes

address-pr-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository jaybocc2/dotfiles (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 526 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens