Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jchildree/Claud-itect-Skill --skill receiving-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jchildree/Claud-itect-SkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jchildree/claud-itect-skill/receiving-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jchildree/claud-itect-skill/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jchildree/claud-itect-skill/receiving-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01569 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
receiving-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 228 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A e9b3316b1f54
receiving-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jchildree/Claud-itect-Skill (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,569 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ce-code-review
Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use before PRs or when asked to review code. Use when the user asks to apply this review's findings locally. Not for resolving feedback already left on a PR; that is ce-resolve-pr-feedback.
ce-resolve-pr-feedback
Resolve PR review feedback. Use when addressing feedback already left on a PR. Not for reviewing the code before feedback exists; that is ce-code-review.
api-design-reviewer
Use when reviewing a proposed REST or GraphQL API change before merge — checks contract clarity, backwards compatibility, errors, pagination, auth, and naming.
grill-me
Adversarial code review before a PR — Claude asks hard questions until you pass the test. Also supports elegant rewrites ("scrap this and implement the elegant solution") and spec-driven development. Use before opening any pull request. For mechanically finding bugs in a diff, prefer a platform-native code-review…
techdebt
Find and eliminate technical debt across the whole codebase — duplicated code, dead code, redundant abstractions. Use at the end of a coding session or when the codebase feels bloated. Reports findings and fixes them with user confirmation. Cleanups limited to the current working changes belong in a native simplify…
review
Dispatched after a task lands at inreview to produce a structured CTO-grade verdict on the work and its PR. Two invocation paths: composer Phase 4 (orchestrator dispatches after the implementer's inreview write, surfaces the verdict to HOTL, stops), and direct mode from the piyaz skill on requests ("review VF-N"…