Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-subcontractorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-subcontractor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-subcontractor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-subcontractor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-subcontractor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-subcontractor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.02928 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00586 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
cwicr-subcontractor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to cwicr-subcontractor — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 372 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CWICR Subcontractor Analyzer
Business Case
Problem Statement
Evaluating subcontractor bids requires:
- Fair price benchmarks
- Bid comparison
- Outlier identification
- Negotiation support
Solution
Compare subcontractor bids against CWICR cost data to identify fair pricing, outliers, and negotiation opportunities.
Business Value
- Fair evaluation - Objective benchmarks
- Cost savings - Identify overpriced bids
- Risk detection - Flag unrealistic low bids
- Negotiation support - Data-driven discussions
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from enum import Enum
from statistics import mean, stdev
class BidStatus(Enum):
"""Bid evaluation status."""
COMPETITIVE = "competitive"
HIGH = "high"
LOW = "low"
OUTLIER_HIGH = "outlier_high"
OUTLIER_LOW = "outlier_low"
@dataclass
class SubcontractorBid:
"""Subcontractor bid."""
subcontractor_name: str
trade: str
bid_amount: float
scope_items: List[Dict[str, Any]]
includes_material: bool
includes_labor: bool
includes_equipment: bool
duration_days: int
notes: str = ""
@dataclass
class BidEvaluation:
"""Bid evaluation result."""
subcontractor_name: str
bid_amount: float
benchmark_cost: float
variance: float
variance_percent: float
status: BidStatus
line_item_analysis: List[Dict[str, Any]]
recommendation: str
class CWICRSubcontractor:
"""Analyze subcontractor bids using CWICR data."""
OUTLIER_THRESHOLD = 0.30 # 30% from benchmark
HIGH_THRESHOLD = 0.15 # 15% above benchmark
LOW_THRESHOLD = -0.10 # 10% below benchmark
def __init__(self,
cwicr_data: pd.DataFrame,
overhead_rate: float = 0.12,
profit_rate: float = 0.10):
self.cost_data = cwicr_data
self.overhead_rate = overhead_rate
self.profit_rate = profit_rate
self._index_data()
def _index_data(self):
"""Index cost data."""
if 'work_item_code' in self.cost_data.columns:
self._code_index = self.cost_data.set_index('work_item_code')
else:
self._code_index = None
def calculate_benchmark(self,
scope_items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
include_overhead: bool = True,
include_profit: bool = True) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Calculate benchmark cost for scope."""
labor = 0
material = 0
equipment = 0
line_items = []
for item in scope_items:
code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code'))
qty = item.get('quantity', 0)
if self._code_index is not None and code in self._code_index.index:
wi = self._code_index.loc[code]
item_labor = float(wi.get('labor_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
item_material = float(wi.get('material_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
item_equipment = float(wi.get('equipment_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
labor += item_labor
material += item_material
equipment += item_equipment
line_items.append({
'code': code,
'quantity': qty,
'labor': round(item_labor, 2),
'material': round(item_material, 2),
'equipment': round(item_equipment, 2),
'total': round(item_labor + item_material + item_equipment, 2)
})
direct_cost = labor + material + equipment
overhead = direct_cost * self.overhead_rate if include_overhead else 0
profit = (direct_cost + overhead) * self.profit_rate if include_profit else 0
return {
'labor': round(labor, 2),
'material': round(material, 2),
'equipment': round(equipment, 2),
'direct_cost': round(direct_cost, 2),
'overhead': round(overhead, 2),
'profit': round(profit, 2),
'total': round(direct_cost + overhead + profit, 2),
'line_items': line_items
}
def evaluate_bid(self, bid: SubcontractorBid) -> BidEvaluation:
"""Evaluate single subcontractor bid."""
benchmark = self.calculate_benchmark(bid.scope_items)
benchmark_cost = benchmark['total']
variance = bid.bid_amount - benchmark_cost
variance_pct = (variance / benchmark_cost * 100) if benchmark_cost > 0 else 0
# Determine status
if variance_pct > self.OUTLIER_THRESHOLD * 100:
status = BidStatus.OUTLIER_HIGH
recommendation = "Bid significantly above benchmark. Request detailed breakdown or reject."
elif variance_pct < -self.OUTLIER_THRESHOLD * 100:
status = BidStatus.OUTLIER_LOW
recommendation = "Bid significantly below benchmark. Verify scope understanding and capacity."
elif variance_pct > self.HIGH_THRESHOLD * 100:
status = BidStatus.HIGH
recommendation = "Bid above benchmark. Consider negotiation or alternative bidders."
elif variance_pct < self.LOW_THRESHOLD * 100:
status = BidStatus.LOW
recommendation = "Bid below benchmark. Verify completeness and quality approach."
else:
status = BidStatus.COMPETITIVE
recommendation = "Bid within acceptable range. Proceed with standard evaluation."
# Line item analysis
line_analysis = []
for i, item in enumerate(bid.scope_items):
if i < len(benchmark['line_items']):
bench_item = benchmark['line_items'][i]
# Assume proportional pricing
expected = bench_item['total'] / benchmark['direct_cost'] * bid.bid_amount if benchmark['direct_cost'] > 0 else 0
line_analysis.append({
'code': item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code')),
'benchmark': bench_item['total'],
'expected_in_bid': round(expected, 2)
})
return BidEvaluation(
subcontractor_name=bid.subcontractor_name,
bid_amount=bid.bid_amount,
benchmark_cost=benchmark_cost,
variance=round(variance, 2),
variance_percent=round(variance_pct, 1),
status=status,
line_item_analysis=line_analysis,
recommendation=recommendation
)
def compare_bids(self,
bids: List[SubcontractorBid]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Compare multiple bids."""
if not bids:
return {}
evaluations = [self.evaluate_bid(bid) for bid in bids]
# Statistics
amounts = [e.bid_amount for e in evaluations]
avg_bid = mean(amounts)
std_bid = stdev(amounts) if len(amounts) > 1 else 0
# Rank by variance from benchmark
ranked = sorted(evaluations, key=lambda x: abs(x.variance_percent))
# Find best value
competitive = [e for e in evaluations if e.status == BidStatus.COMPETITIVE]
if competitive:
best_value = min(competitive, key=lambda x: x.bid_amount)
else:
best_value = ranked[0]
# Identify outliers
outliers = [e for e in evaluations if e.status in [BidStatus.OUTLIER_HIGH, BidStatus.OUTLIER_LOW]]
return {
'bid_count': len(bids),
'average_bid': round(avg_bid, 2),
'std_deviation': round(std_bid, 2),
'spread': round(max(amounts) - min(amounts), 2),
'spread_percent': round((max(amounts) - min(amounts)) / avg_bid * 100, 1) if avg_bid > 0 else 0,
'benchmark': evaluations[0].benchmark_cost,
'best_value': {
'name': best_value.subcontractor_name,
'amount': best_value.bid_amount,
'variance_from_benchmark': best_value.variance_percent
},
'lowest_bid': {
'name': min(evaluations, key=lambda x: x.bid_amount).subcontractor_name,
'amount': min(amounts)
},
'outliers': [
{'name': e.subcontractor_name, 'status': e.status.value, 'variance': e.variance_percent}
for e in outliers
],
'evaluations': evaluations
}
def generate_negotiation_points(self,
evaluation: BidEvaluation) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""Generate negotiation points based on evaluation."""
points = []
if evaluation.status in [BidStatus.HIGH, BidStatus.OUTLIER_HIGH]:
points.append({
'topic': 'Overall Price',
'benchmark': evaluation.benchmark_cost,
'bid': evaluation.bid_amount,
'target': round(evaluation.benchmark_cost * 1.05, 2), # 5% above benchmark
'potential_savings': round(evaluation.bid_amount - evaluation.benchmark_cost * 1.05, 2)
})
# Suggest line item discussions
for item in evaluation.line_item_analysis:
points.append({
'topic': f"Line Item: {item['code']}",
'benchmark': item['benchmark'],
'suggestion': 'Request detailed breakdown'
})
return points
def export_bid_comparison(self,
comparison: Dict[str, Any],
output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export bid comparison to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Summary
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
'Number of Bids': comparison['bid_count'],
'Average Bid': comparison['average_bid'],
'Spread': comparison['spread'],
'Spread %': comparison['spread_percent'],
'Benchmark': comparison['benchmark'],
'Best Value Bidder': comparison['best_value']['name'],
'Lowest Bidder': comparison['lowest_bid']['name']
}])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# All evaluations
eval_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Subcontractor': e.subcontractor_name,
'Bid Amount': e.bid_amount,
'Benchmark': e.benchmark_cost,
'Variance': e.variance,
'Variance %': e.variance_percent,
'Status': e.status.value,
'Recommendation': e.recommendation
}
for e in comparison['evaluations']
])
eval_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Evaluations', index=False)
return output_path
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 372 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A b8c7c9b75dd0
cwicr-subcontractor is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,928 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to cwicr-subcontractor, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
close-management
Manage the month-end close process with task sequencing, dependencies, and status tracking. Use when planning the close calendar, tracking close progress, identifying blockers, or sequencing close activities by day.
weekly-update
OpenDesign's weekly metrics standup: this week's numbers, the one anomaly, and the single decision it forces. Built as a decision-grade data & finance deck for ops & growth team.
procurement-optimizer
Use when running an annual SaaS audit, doing category-level spend review, or rationalizing the supplier base — when the user needs a spend audit, spend categorization (UNSPSC-aligned with Pareto breakdown and industry profiles), purchasing-cycle analysis (bottleneck categories per Goldratt's Theory of Constraints), or…
closing-checklist
What's blocking close — maintain the closing checklist with status, critical path, and days to close. Self-updating: ingests new items from diligence findings and schedule builds, tracks status, surfaces what's blocking. Use when user says "closing checklist", "what's left to close", "checklist status", "add to the…
dd-checklist
Generate and track comprehensive due diligence checklists tailored to the target company's sector, deal type, and complexity. Covers all major workstreams with request lists, status tracking, and red flag escalation. Use when kicking off diligence, organizing a data room review, or tracking outstanding items. Triggers…
bo-vendor-review
A framework for comparing supplier proposals and renewal choices using costs, service terms, operational fit, contracts, and business-continuity risks. It treats one-time, recurring, and usage-based charges separately when comparing prices.