Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jellydn/my-ai-tools --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jellydn/my-ai-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00874 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix PR Review Comments
Fix PR review comments by implementing the requested changes.
Usage
/pr-review <PR_URL> # Review PR by URL (expects full GitHub URL)
/pr-review <PR_NUMBER> # Review PR by number (expects number, e.g., 123)
/pr-review # Auto-detect PR from current branch
📋 Argument Handling
The command accepts the PR identifier from $ARGUMENTS:
- PR URL: Full GitHub PR URL (e.g.,
https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123) - PR Number: Just the PR number (e.g.,
123) - No Arguments: Auto-detect the PR associated with the current Git branch
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the PR identifier. Otherwise, auto-detect the current branch's PR using:
gh pr view --json number,url -q '.number'
This extracts the PR number from the current branch's open PR for use in subsequent commands.
If no open PR is found for the current branch, show this error:
Error: No open pull request found for the current branch.
To review a specific PR:
/pr-review <PR_URL>
/pr-review <PR_NUMBER>
Or create a PR first:
gh pr create
Process
- Parse
$ARGUMENTSto determine PR identifier (URL, number, or auto-detect) - Fetch PR details and review comments using
ghCLI - Parse review comments to understand what needs to be changed
- For each comment, implement the fix
- Run tests to ensure nothing breaks
- Commit the changes
Available Scripts
Extract PR Comments
The extract-pr-comments.js script processes GitHub PR review comments and issue comments to create actionable TODO lists.
# Usage
node $SKILL_PATH/scripts/extract-pr-comments.js <review-comments-file> <issue-comments-file> [output-file]
# Example
node $SKILL_PATH/scripts/extract-pr-comments.js \
pr-4972-review-comments-raw.json \
pr-4972-issue-comments-raw.json \
pr-4972-comments.ndjson
What it does:
- Filters out comments with replies (likely resolved)
- Classifies comments by severity (critical, high, medium, low)
- Categorizes comments (security, performance, maintainability, etc.)
- Creates 3 output files:
.ndjson- Structured comment data-todo.md- Prioritized TODO list-summary.md- Analysis summary with emojis
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 124 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 21ddbe81fdfa
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jellydn/my-ai-tools (120 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 874 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code for performance, concurrency safety, security vulnerabilities, or readability issues.
code-simplifier
Use when code has excessive complexity, deep nesting, unused abstractions, or violates YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles and needs simplification or cleanup.
agent-watchdog
Use when asked to watch, babysit, audit, review, compare, or fix another agent's work from a Codex session ID, Claude Code session/transcript, chat/thread link, PR, branch, log, or pasted run summary. Monitor until the other agent is done or blocked, reconstruct what the user asked, independently investigate the same…
comet-verify
Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close. Invoke with /comet-verify. Verify implementation matches design, handle development branch.
agent-design-best-practices
Best practices for designing Claude Code agent files (.claude/agents/.md). This skill should be used when writing or reviewing agent markdown files to ensure proper design with focused domains, correct tool access, reusable definitions, and separation of capabilities from lifecycle. Combines Anthropic's official…
graphify-dotnet
Use graphify-dotnet to generate codebase knowledge graphs, architecture snapshots, and exportable repository maps from .NET or polyglot source trees, with optional AI-enriched semantic relationships. USE FOR: graphify commands; graph JSON, HTML, SVG, Cypher, Markdown, and Obsidian exports; repository map and…