jentic-api-scorecard: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/review-community/SKILL.md

review-community is a skill for Claude Code from jentic/jentic-api-scorecard. It costs 73 tokens per session (794 once invoked), scanned B, original, Apache-2.0.

A process for reviewing someone else’s GitHub pull request, a proposed set of code changes, with a diplomatic commenting style.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify pull-request authorship and review another contributor’s changes with the team’s prescribed tone.
Why use it?
It prevents accidentally applying the wrong review workflow to your own pull request and keeps feedback constructive.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

This is jentic/jentic-api-scorecard's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on jentic-api-scorecard itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything jentic-api-scorecard configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to jentic/jentic-api-scorecard. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/main/.claude/skills/review-community/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-community

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/review-community/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/review-community)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/review-community"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/review-community/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-community

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/review-community"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jentic/jentic-api-scorecard/review-community.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 794 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00073 $0.00794
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00397
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00159
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00079

Measured 10d ago against content hash c457e440a696, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

review-community scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping

.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.

!`cat .claude/output-styles/review-comments.md`
.claude/skills/review-community/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/review-community — review someone else's PR with the community tone

This skill wraps the built-in /review command with two additions:

  1. Authorship guard — refuses to run if the PR author's GitHub login matches the current user's. For self-reviews, use /review directly with its default voice.
  2. Tone injection — inlines the diplomatic review-comments style into this turn so the tone applies without flipping the session output style. Activating the style via /config → Output style would replace Claude Code's default software-engineering system prompt; this skill avoids that by overlaying the tone on top of the default.

Tone for this review

The tone, structure, and constraints below are the source of truth for voice and feedback structure. Follow them for every comment drafted in this review.

!cat .claude/output-styles/review-comments.md

Phase 0 — Resolve PR and verify authorship

Run this once and use the values for the rest of the skill. set -e ensures any failed command stops the block; if it stops, surface the error to the user and do not proceed.

set -e

if [ -n "$ARGUMENTS" ]; then
  PR="$ARGUMENTS"
else
  PR=$(gh pr view --json number -q .number)
fi

PR_AUTHOR=$(gh pr view "$PR" --json author -q .author.login)
GH_USER=$(gh api user -q .login)

echo "PR=$PR"
echo "PR_AUTHOR=$PR_AUTHOR"
echo "GH_USER=$GH_USER"

Expected outcomes:

  • gh pr view with no argument fails (no PR for current branch) → stop and ask the user for a PR number or URL. Don't guess.
  • gh api user fails or returns empty $GH_USER → stop. The authorship guard cannot run without a confirmed login. Tell the user to authenticate (gh auth status) and try again.
  • $PR_AUTHOR equals $GH_USER → stop. Tell the user this is their own PR and to use /review directly. Do not proceed.
  • $PR_AUTHOR differs from $GH_USER → continue. State who authored the PR before starting the review, so the user has confirmation the guard saw the right author.

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 79 lines · 73 tokens per session scan B c457e440a696

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-community is a skill published in the GitHub repository jentic/jentic-api-scorecard (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 794 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr-threshold

Track commit accumulation and trigger PR when thresholds crossed.

WellApp-ai/Well · 13 tokens

dos-verify-done-claims

Before accepting an agent's 'done / shipped / fixed' claim, verify it against ground truth (git ancestry + the commit's own diff) using the DOS kernel's dos verify and dos commit-audit — never the agent's own narration.

anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernel · 61 tokens

gitlab-merge-request-review

Review and merge GitLab merge requests via the gitlab-api MCP server — by default the MRs assigned to you or where you are a reviewer, optionally scoped to a project, group, or the whole instance. Read an MR, gate it on a green pipeline (pipeline → jobs → job log), then approve, accept/merge, or set…

Knuckles-Team/gitlab-api · 158 tokens

code-review

Systematic code review SOP covering correctness, security, performance, and maintainability — plus GitHub PR review workflow (diff, inline comments, approve via gh/REST).

furkangonel/cowrangler · 37 tokens

OpenAPI Contract Completeness

Ensure OpenAPI specs define consistent request/response schemas, error model, auth, pagination, and backward compatibility.

s977043/river-review · 28 tokens

fresh-eyes-review

This skill should be used as a mandatory final sanity check before git commit, PR creation, or declaring work done. Triggers on "commit", "push", "PR", "pull request", "done", "finished", "complete", "ship", "deploy", "ready to merge". Catches security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and business rule bugs that slip…

2389-research/fresh-eyes-review · 83 tokens